Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Is Processing.js worth it?

I am holding back on seriously pursuing ProcessingJS pieces mostly due to the bloat of the library. I have found that pieces like Ball Droppings do not use the library's Processing syntax parser, which is good, since I imagine it would slow down the page more, especially adding to the initial load and setup time. Still, I am wondering if it's worthwhile to use it basically as a big utility library like UnderscoreJS. For example, how good is its implementation with SVG compared with the other libraries out there today like RaphaelJS? Has anyone gone through the implementation of the Processing API extensively enough? When I skim through the I see a lot of boilerplate I don't really need, as well as a couple instances of questionable coding practices. But the library still seems to perform decently, at least on the ProcessingJS homepage, although the examples are set to run at 15fps, and not the (in my opinion) minimally acceptable 24fps.

like image 485
hlfcoding Avatar asked Nov 03 '10 11:11

hlfcoding


People also ask

Is Processing js still used?

js is a discontinued JavaScript port of Processing, a framework designed to write visualisations, images, and interactive content.

Should I learn p5 js or Processing?

You should start with p5. js. Behind the scenes, p5. js is a JavaScript library, so you can use anything you know about HTML, CSS, and JavaScript with p5.

Is Processing js the same as JavaScript?

Processing.org is the official site for the language and has more about what you can do with it. p5. js is a version of Processing that is based off JavaScript rather than Java (despite the name similarities, they are completely different coding languages).

What replaced Processing js?

The best alternative is D3. js, which is both free and Open Source. Other great sites and apps similar to Processing. js are RAWGraphs, Processing, p5.


1 Answers

I think it strongly depends on the project you are working on and the background knowledge you have with the processing library.

Processing.js is a great choice if you already have learned the original processing api (java) and want to leverage your existing knowledge in the web environment. It might be the only choice if you want to port an existing project to the web - actually this is probably the best time to use it.

If you are a JavaScript programmer and don't know much about processing you probably will dislike to write Java syntax in the browser and everything becomes even more problematic if you have to mix it with js. The API doesn't feel like JavaScript and there is a lot of code that could be written more elegantly.

Regarding performance it is not a bad choice, actually most projects run smoothly and I can definitely recommend using processing.js on circumstances like those explained above.

Here is great list of various javascript engines out there: Javascript Graphic/Game Engines

It is hard to recommend a single library, as the requirements are specific to each project. For simple graphics/diagrams: RaphaelJs is really nice and performs decently

like image 195
DominikGuzei Avatar answered Oct 11 '22 14:10

DominikGuzei