I'm reading "Pro Javascript Techniques" from John Resig, and I'm confused with an example. This is the code:
// Create a new user object that accepts an object of properties
function User( properties ) {
// Iterate through the properties of the object, and make sure
// that it's properly scoped (as discussed previously)
for ( var i in properties ) { (function(){
// Create a new getter for the property
this[ "get" + i ] = function() {
return properties[i];
};
// Create a new setter for the property
this[ "set" + i ] = function(val) {
properties[i] = val;
};
})(); }
}
// Create a new user object instance and pass in an object of
// properties to seed it with
var user = new User({
name: "Bob",
age: 44
});
// Just note that the name property does not exist, as it's private
// within the properties object
alert( user.name == null );
// However, we're able to access its value using the new getname()
// method, that was dynamically generated
alert( user.getname() == "Bob" );
// Finally, we can see that it's possible to set and get the age using
// the newly generated functions
user.setage( 22 );
alert( user.getage() == 22 );
Now running that on Firebug console (on FF3) throws that user.getname() is not a function. I tried doing this:
var other = User
other()
window.getname() --> this works!
And it worked!
Any idea why? thanks everybody!
PS: I strongly recommend this book.
EDIT:
doing:
var me = this;
seems to work a bit better, but when executing "getname()" it returns '44' (the second property)...
also I find it strange that it worked on the window object without modification...
and a third question, what's the difference between PEZ solution and the original? (he doesn't use an anonymous function)
Thanks to everyone for the feedback! +1
I think it's best not to use the new
keyword at all when working in JavaScript.
This is because if you then instantiate the object without using the new keyword (ex: var user = User()
) by mistake, *very bad things will happen...*reason being that in the function (if instantiated without the new
keyword), the this
will refer to the global object, ie the window
...
So therefore, I suggest a better way on how to use class-like objects.
Consider the following example :
var user = function (props) {
var pObject = {};
for (p in props) {
(function (pc) {
pObject['set' + pc] = function (v) {
props[pc] = v;
return pObject;
}
pObject['get' + pc] = function () {
return props[pc];
}
})(p);
}
return pObject;
}
In the above example, I am creating a new object inside of the function, and then attaching getters and setters to this newly created object.
Finally, I am returning this newly created object. Note that the the this
keyword is not used anywhere
Then, to 'instantiate' a user
, I would do the following:
var john = user({name : 'Andreas', age : 21});
john.getname(); //returns 'Andreas'
john.setage(19).getage(); //returns 19
The best way to avoid falling into pitfalls is by not creating them in the first place...In the above example, I am avoiding the new
keyword pitfall (as i said, not using the new
keyword when it's supposed to be used will cause bad things to happen) by not using new
at all.
EDIT: now, adapting Jason's answer, it works:
We need to make a closure for the values. Here's one way:
function bindAccessors(o, property, value) {
var _value = value;
o["get" + property] = function() {
return _value;
};
o["set" + property] = function(v) {
_value = v;
};
}
Then the User constructor looks like this:
function User( properties ) {
for (var i in properties ) {
bindAccessors(this, i, properties[i]);
}
}
you probably want something like this, which is more readable: (closures are easy to learn once you get some practice)
function User( properties ) {
// helper function to create closures based on passed-in arguments:
var bindGetterSetter = function(obj,p,properties)
{
obj["get"+p]=function() { return properties[p]; }
obj["set"+p]=function(val) { properties[p]=val; return this; }
};
for (var p in properties)
bindGetterSetter(this, p, properties);
}
I also added "return this;" so you can do:
u=new User({a: 1, b:77, c:48});
u.seta(3).setb(20).setc(400)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With