Basically, I am using the following code to parse string as LocalDateTime, which works fine most of the time.
DateTimeFormatter dtformatter = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyyMMddHHmmssSSS");
However, I encounter cases where the seconds and millseconds are 00000
and this is when the parser fails and print a LocalDateTime
2018-03-01T09:16
instead of 2018-03-01T09:16:00.000
.
System.out.println(LocalDateTime.parse("20180301091600000",dtformatter));
(Note that in my code, I have to parse string as LocalDateTime
, do some comparison and then at the end, print LocalDateTime
to csv)
How can I fix it to make it print 2018-03-01T09:16:00.000
instead of 2018-03-01T09:16
?
FYI, I am using jdk10.
Yes, it is: DateTimeFormat is thread-safe and immutable, and the formatters it returns are as well.
DateTimeFormatter is a replacement for the old SimpleDateFormat that is thread-safe and provides additional functionality.
DateTimeFormatter fmt = DateTimeFormatter. ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss"); System. out. println(ldt.
The DateTimeFormatter class is used to both parse and format dates according to specified Date and Time Patterns. Use parse(...) method to convert from String to Date/Time classes, use format(...) method to convert from Date/Time into String.
where the seconds and millseconds are 00000 and this is when the parser fails
No, the parser succeeds. Your issue is with generating a String, not parsing.
The default DateTimeFormatter
suppresses zero values in seconds and fractional second, as documented.
Your problem is not in the parsing, but in the generating of a string after parsing. Keep in mind that the textual representation of a date-time object is distinct and separate from the object. In other words, a date-time object does not have a “format”.
[String] -->
parse
--> [LocalDateTime] -->toString
--> [String]
The documentation for LocalDateTime::toString
clearly says that the shortest possible formatting variation will be used when encountering zero values in the least-significant parts. To quote:
The output will be one of the following ISO-8601 formats:
uuuu-MM-dd'T'HH:mm
uuuu-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss
uuuu-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSS
uuuu-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSSSS
uuuu-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSSSSSSS
The format used will be the shortest that outputs the full value of the time where the omitted parts are implied to be zero.
Regarding two examples shown in the accepted Answer by YCF_L…
20180301091600001 result is 2018-03-01T09:16:00.001
In that example, the least-significant part (millisecond) has a non-zero value, so it is represented in the result.
2018030100000000 result is 2018-03-01T00:00
In that example, the least significant parts of hour, minute, second, milliseconds, microseconds, and nanoseconds are all zero. So their display is suppressed, except for hours and minutes as the documentation promises that year-minute is always displayed.
So both of your examples work as documented; feature, not a bug.
The solution is to not use the default formatter provided in the toString
method. Instead, use another formatter. For example, use the same custom formatter you defined for parsing.
DateTimeFormatter f = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern( "yyyyMMddHHmmssSSS" );
LocalDateTime ldt = LocalDateTime.parse( "20180301091600000" , f );
String outputDefault = ldt.toString();
String outputCustom = ldt.format( f );
Dump to console.
System.out.println( "outputDefault: " + outputDefault );
System.out.println( "outputCustom: " + outputCustom );
outputDefault: 2018-03-01T09:16
outputCustom: 20180301091600000
The Question asks:
How can I fix it to make it print 2018-03-01T09:16:00.000 instead of 2018-03-01T09:16 ?
Specify a custom formatter instead of the default formatter.
DateTimeFormatter f = DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern("yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss:SSS") ;
String output = ldt.format( f ) ;
But keep in mind your generated String will suppress display of any microseconds or nanoseconds in the LocalDateTime
object.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With