Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Java Concurrency in Practice: race condition in BoundedExecutor?

There's something odd about the implementation of the BoundedExecutor in the book Java Concurrency in Practice.

It's supposed to throttle task submission to the Executor by blocking the submitting thread when there are enough threads either queued or running in the Executor.

This is the implementation (after adding the missing rethrow in the catch clause):

public class BoundedExecutor {
    private final Executor exec;
    private final Semaphore semaphore;

    public BoundedExecutor(Executor exec, int bound) {
        this.exec = exec;
        this.semaphore = new Semaphore(bound);
    }

    public void submitTask(final Runnable command) throws InterruptedException, RejectedExecutionException {
        semaphore.acquire();

        try {
            exec.execute(new Runnable() {
                @Override public void run() {
                    try {
                        command.run();
                    } finally {
                        semaphore.release();
                    }
                }
            });
        } catch (RejectedExecutionException e) {
            semaphore.release();
            throw e;
        }
    }

When I instantiate the BoundedExecutor with an Executors.newCachedThreadPool() and a bound of 4, I would expect the number of threads instantiated by the cached thread pool to never exceed 4. In practice, however, it does. I've gotten this little test program to create as much as 11 threads:

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
    class CountingThreadFactory implements ThreadFactory {
        int count;

        @Override public Thread newThread(Runnable r) {
            ++count;
            return new Thread(r);
        }           
    }

    List<Integer> counts = new ArrayList<Integer>();

    for (int n = 0; n < 100; ++n) {
        CountingThreadFactory countingThreadFactory = new CountingThreadFactory();
        ExecutorService exec = Executors.newCachedThreadPool(countingThreadFactory);

        try {
            BoundedExecutor be = new BoundedExecutor(exec, 4);

            for (int i = 0; i < 20000; ++i) {
                be.submitTask(new Runnable() {
                    @Override public void run() {}
                });
            }
        } finally {
            exec.shutdown();
        }

        counts.add(countingThreadFactory.count);
    }

    System.out.println(Collections.max(counts));
}

I think there's a tiny little time frame between the release of the semaphore and the task ending, where another thread can aquire a permit and submit a task while the releasing thread hasn't finished yet. In other words, it has a race condition.

Can someone confirm this?

like image 239
Jan Van den bosch Avatar asked Apr 10 '12 18:04

Jan Van den bosch


1 Answers

BoundedExecutor was indeed intended as an illustration of how to throttle task submission, not as a way to place a bound on thread pool size. There are more direct ways to achieve the latter, as at least one comment pointed out.

But the other answers don't mention the text in the book that says to use an unbounded queue and to

set the bound on the semaphore to be equal to the pool size plus the number of queued tasks you want to allow, since the semaphore is bounding the number of tasks both currently executing and awaiting execution. [JCiP, end of section 8.3.3]

By mentioning unbounded queues and pool size, we were implying (apparently not very clearly) the use of a thread pool of bounded size.

What has always bothered me about BoundedExecutor, however, is that it doesn't implement the ExecutorService interface. A modern way to achieve similar functionality and still implement the standard interfaces would be to use Guava's listeningDecorator method and ForwardingListeningExecutorService class.

like image 74
Tim Peierls Avatar answered Oct 21 '22 22:10

Tim Peierls