_logger.info("data size : "+saleData.size);
    saleData.parallelStream().forEach(data -> {
                SaleAggrData saleAggrData = new SaleAggrData() {
                    {
                        setCatId(data.getCatId());
                        setRevenue(RoundUpUtil.roundUpDouble(data.getRevenue()));
                        setMargin(RoundUpUtil.roundUpDouble(data.getMargin()));
                        setUnits(data.getUnits());
                        setMarginRate(ComputeUtil.marginRate(data.getRevenue(), data.getMargin()));
                        setOtd(ComputeUtil.OTD(data.getRevenue(), data.getUnits()));
                        setSaleDate(data.getSaleDate());
                        setDiscountDepth(ComputeUtil.discountDepth(data.getRegularPrice(), data.getRevenue()));
                        setTransactions(data.getTransactions());
                        setUpt(ComputeUtil.UPT(data.getUnits(), data.getTransactions()));
                    }
                };
                salesAggrData.addSaleAggrData(saleAggrData);
            });
The Issue with code is that when I am getting an response from DB, and while iterating using a parallel stream, the data size is different every time, while when using a sequential stream it's working fine.
I can't use a sequential Stream because the data is huge and it's taking time.
Any lead would be helpful.
You are adding elements in parallel to salesAggrData which I'm assuming is some Collection. If it's not a thread-safe Collection, no wonder you get inconsistent results.
Instead of forEach, why don't you use map() and then collect the result into some Collection?
List<SaleAggrData> salesAggrData =
    saleData.parallelStream()
            .map(data -> {
                    SaleAggrData saleAggrData = new SaleAggrData() {
                        {
                            setCatId(data.getCatId());
                            setRevenue(RoundUpUtil.roundUpDouble(data.getRevenue()));
                            setMargin(RoundUpUtil.roundUpDouble(data.getMargin()));
                            setUnits(data.getUnits());
                            setMarginRate(ComputeUtil.marginRate(data.getRevenue(), data.getMargin()));
                            setOtd(ComputeUtil.OTD(data.getRevenue(), data.getUnits()));
                            setSaleDate(data.getSaleDate());
                            setDiscountDepth(ComputeUtil.discountDepth(data.getRegularPrice(), data.getRevenue()));
                            setTransactions(data.getTransactions());
                            setUpt(ComputeUtil.UPT(data.getUnits(), data.getTransactions()));
                        }
                    };
                    return saleAggrData;
            })
            .collect(Collectors.toList());
BTW, I'd probably change that anonymous class instance creation, and use a constructor of a named class to create the SaleAggrData instances.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With