I understand that in Swift 3 there have been some changes from typical C Style for-loops. I've been working around it, but it seems like I'm writing more code than before in many cases. Maybe someone can steer me in the right direction because this is what I want:
let names : [String] = ["Jim", "Jenny", "Earl"]
for var i = 0; i < names.count - 1; i+=1 {
NSLog("%@ loves %@", names[i], names[i+1])
}
Pretty simple stuff. I like to be able to get the index I'm on, and I like the for-loop to not run if names.count == 0. All in one go.
But it seems like my options in Swift 3 aren't allowing me this. I would have to do something like:
let names : [String] = ["Jim", "Jenny", "Earl"]
if names.count > 0 {
for i in 0...(names.count - 1) {
NSLog("%@ loves %@", names[i], names[i+1])
}
}
The if statement at the start is needed because my program will crash in the situation where it reads: for i in 0...0 { }
I also like the idea of being able to just iterate through everything without explicitly setting the index:
// Pseudocode
for name in names.exceptLastOne {
NSLog("%@ loves %@", name, name.plus(1))
}
I feel like there is some sort of syntax that mixes all my wants, but I haven't come across it yet. Does anyone know of a way? Or at least a way to make my code more compact?
UPDATE: Someone suggested that this question has already been asked, citing a SO post where the solution was to use something to the degree of:
for (index, name) in names.enumerated {}
The problem with this when compared to Hamish's answer is that I only am given the index of the current name. That doesn't allow me to get the value at index without needing to do something like:
names[index + 1]
That's just one extra variable to keep track of. I prefer Hamish's which is:
for i in names.indices.dropLast() {
print("\(names[i]) loves \(names[i + 1])")
}
Short, simple, and only have to keep track of names and i, rather than names, index, and name.
lastIndexOf() The lastIndexOf() method returns the last index at which a given element can be found in the array, or -1 if it is not present. The array is searched backwards, starting at fromIndex .
1) Using the array length property The length property returns the number of elements in an array. Subtracting 1 from the length of an array gives the index of the last element of an array using which the last element can be accessed.
The key insight here is that, in one-based indexing, the index of the last item is the length of the array. If the array has a length of 3, you know that the last element in the array has an index of 3 .
Get the last element of the list using the “length of list - 1” as an index and print the resultant last element of the list. Get the last element of the list using − 1(negative indexing) as the index and print the resultant last element of the list.
One option would be to use dropLast()
on the array's indices
, allowing you to iterate over a CountableRange
of all but the last index of the array.
let names = ["Jim", "Jenny", "Earl"]
for i in names.indices.dropLast() {
print("\(names[i]) loves \(names[i + 1])")
}
If the array has less than two elements, the loop won't be entered.
Another option would be to zip
the array with the array where the first element has been dropped, allowing you to iterate through the pairs of elements with their successor elements:
for (nameA, nameB) in zip(names, names.dropFirst()) {
print("\(nameA) loves \(nameB)")
}
This takes advantage of the fact that zip
truncates the longer of the two sequences if they aren't of equal length. Therefore if the array has less than two elements, again, the loop won't be entered.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With