Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

Iterating over a vector in reverse direction

Tags:

c++

iteration

stl

I need to iterate over a vector from the end to the beginnig. The "correct" way is

for(std::vector<SomeT>::reverse_iterator rit = v.rbegin(); rit != v.rend(); ++rit) {     //do Something } 

When doSomething involves knowing the actual index, then some calculations need to be done with rit to obtain it, like index = v.size() - 1 - (rit - v.rbegin)

If the index is needed anyway, then I strongly believe it is better to iterate using that index

for(int i = v.size() - 1; i >= 0; --i) {     //do something with v[i] and i;  } 

This gives a warning that i is signed and v.size() is unsigned. Changing to

for(unsigned i = v.size() - 1; i >= 0; --i) is just functionally wrong, because this is essentially an endless loop :)

What is an aesthetically good way to do what I want to do which

  • is warning-free
  • doesn't involve casts
  • is not overly verbose

I hope I am not looking for something that doesn't exist :)

like image 436
Armen Tsirunyan Avatar asked Nov 17 '10 15:11

Armen Tsirunyan


People also ask

How do you iterate backwards in C++?

C++ Iterators Reverse Iterators A reverse iterator is made from a bidirectional, or random access iterator which it keeps as a member which can be accessed through base() . To iterate backwards use rbegin() and rend() as the iterators for the end of the collection, and the start of the collection respectively.

How do you reverse a set iterate?

C++ set rbegin() C++ set rbegin() function is used to return a reverse iterator referring to the last element of the set container. A reverse iterator of set moves in reverse direction and incrementing it until it reaches to the beginning (First element) of the set container.

What is rend () in C++?

The rend() function is an inbuilt function in C++ STL which returns a reverse iterator pointing to the theoretical element right before the first key-value pair in the map(which is considered its reverse end). Syntax: map_name.rend()


1 Answers

As you've noted, the problem with a condition of i >= 0 when it's unsigned is that the condition is always true. Instead of subtracting 1 when you initialize i and then again after each iteration, subtract 1 after checking the loop condition:

for (unsigned i = v.size(); i-- > 0; ) 

I like this style for several reasons:

  • Although i will wrap around to UINT_MAX at the end of the loop, it doesn't rely on that behavior — it would work the same if the types were signed. Relying on unsigned wraparound feels like a bit of a hack to me.
  • It calls size() exactly once.
  • It doesn't use >=. Whenever I see that operator in a for loop, I have to re-read it to make sure there isn't an off-by-one error.
  • If you change the spacing in the conditional, you can make it use the "goes to" operator.
like image 120
Rob Kennedy Avatar answered Sep 16 '22 12:09

Rob Kennedy