I am porting some code to Parallel.ForEach
and got an error with a continue
I have in the code. Is there something equivalent I can use in a Parallel.ForEach
functionally equivalent to continue
in a foreach
loop?
Parallel.ForEach(items, parallelOptions, item =>
{
if (!isTrue)
continue;
});
return;
(the body is just a function called for each item)
When you converted your loop into a compatible definition for the Parallel.Foreach logic, you ended up making the statement body a lambda. Well, that is an action that gets called by the Parallel function.
So, replace continue
with return
, and break with Stop()
or Break()
statements.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With