In C#, I know that I can overload the constructor for a class by specifying it in the body of the class:
public class MyClass()
{
public MyClass(String s) { ... }
}
This overrides the default constructor (which has no parameters) and forces the class to be initialized with parameter s.
I know that in VBA I can initialize my class with Private Sub Class_Initialize()
, but I don't know if there's a way to force my class to be initialized with parameters. Can this be done?
The Initialize event occurs when you: Create a new instance of a class directly by using the New keyword with the Set statement. Dimension an object variable using the New keyword and creating an instance of a class indirectly by setting or returning a property or applying a method defined in the class module.
A class object with a constructor must be explicitly initialized or have a default constructor. Except for aggregate initialization, explicit initialization using a constructor is the only way to initialize non-static constant and reference class members.
Constructors for Initialization. A constructor must have the same name as the class. A constructor's function definition cannot return a value. No type, not even void, can be given at the start of the constructor's function prototype or in the function header.
As Jtolle indicated, this is simply not possible in VBA/VB6. There is no perfect way to work around this but, what I personally do is create a Public/Friend sub call Initialize with the parameters I want (in VBA/VB6 you use "Optional" parameters for overloading) and then put a quick check in all exposed members of the class that throws an exception if you try to access them without running the initialize method. A basic example might look like this:
Option Explicit
Private m_blnInitialized As Boolean
Private m_lngID As Long
Private m_strFirstName As String
Public Sub Initialize(ByVal ID As Long, Optional ByVal someOtherThing As String = vbNullString)
If m_blnInitialized Then Me.Clear
m_lngID = ID
m_strFirstName = SomeLookUp()
If LenB(someOtherThing) Then
''Do something here.
End If
m_blnInitialized = True
End Sub
Public Property Get ID() As Long
If Not m_blnInitialized Then Err.Raise eStandardErrors.eNotInitialized
ID = m_lngID
End Property
Public Property Get FirstName() As String
If Not m_blnInitialized Then Err.Raise eStandardErrors.eNotInitialized
FirstName = m_strFirstName
End Property
Private Function SomeLookUp() As String
''perform magic on Me.ID
End Function
Public Sub LoadPicture()
If Not m_blnInitialized Then Err.Raise eStandardErrors.eNotInitialized
''More magic
End Sub
Public Sub Clear()
If Not m_blnInitialized Then Err.Raise eStandardErrors.eNotInitialized
m_strFirstName = vbNullString
m_lngID = 0&
m_blnInitialized = False
End Sub
It's not great, but it's about as good as it's going to get with VBA/VB6.
You already have two correct answers; you can't literally have a constructor with parameters in VBA.
Oorang's workaround is basically right - have a separate "init" method. When I do take an object-oriented approach to something in Excel/VBA, I prefer to hide both object creation and init in a regular function. So I'd have mkFoo(parm) and call it to get a Foo instance. mkFoo() would create a New Foo instance and call Foo.init(). If you only ever create instances that way, you don't need to check if your instance has been initialized over and over again.
If you're really trying to be correct and not supply an object with a maybe-now-dangerous init() method exposed, you can have an IFoo interface (with no init method) that is implemented by Foo. Then mkFoo() returns an IFoo, and any users of the actual Foo never see the init() method at all.
Of course, now you have a bunch of modules just for Foo - one for IFoo, one for each actual Foo class, and one for your "Foo factory" function...thus my comment that this is one of many reasons why OOP in VBA is a PITA, even if it is useful sometimes.
EDIT: This was an edit by onedaywhen from shortly after the original answer, but I pulled it out separately just now since it is really a separate thought:
Speaking of Excel, you could relocate the Foo class into a .xla add-in and make the class PublicNotCreateable. The Public Function mkFoo(parm) could reside in a standard .bas module in the add-in and therefore called a bit like a static class in C#. This forces client code to use mkFoo as the only way of creating a Foo instance. No doubt there is a MS Access analogy to Excel's .xla add-ins.
No, classes cannot be initialized with parameters in VBA. This wouldn't be legal because of the Dim ... As New ... statement
, which implicitly constructs objects when they're first accessed.
Dim x As New MyClass
x.Prop = 42 ' Before x.Prop is set, x is implicitly constructed
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With