I mean library and syntax of C#.
So, after all these years of its evolution, mono is capable of running many of original . NET Framework application types on operating systems other than Windows. This includes GUI-enabled desktop applications, which can now be made compatible with virtually any modern desktop operating system, including Solaris.
NET is platform dependent, Mono allows developers to build Linux and cross- platform applications. Mono's . NET implementation is based on the ECMA standards for C#. This paper examines both of these programming environments with the goal of evaluating the performance characteristics of each.
NET Core, which natively only allows you to build console apps and web applications, mono allows you to build many application types available in . NET Framework, including GUI-enabled desktop apps. So, if mono can do everything that . NET Core can while .
CoreCLR will extend . NET Core 3 to encompass the features of . NET Framework and mono; mono will continue to exist so developers can choose to target either it or CoreCLR. Developers should be working to get as much of their code to target .
For the class library, ask the Mono Class Library status page
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With