Actually I need something like List<KeyValuePair<T, U>>
but I want to be able to initialize it like dictionary (i.e. without writing new KeyValuePair
every time). Like this:
Dictionary<string, string> dic = new Dictionary<string, string>
{
{ "key1", "value1"},
{ "key2", "value2"}
};
EDIT: It turns out .NET does have a combination list/dictionary type already: OrderedDictionary
. Unfortunately this is a non-generic type, making it rather less attractive in my view. However, it retains the insertion order if you just call Add
repeatedly.
It's a little strange as calling Add
does not affect entries where a key already exists, whereas using the indexer to add a key/value pair will overwrite a previous association. Basically it doesn't seem like a terribly nice API, and I would personally still avoid it unless your use case exactly matches its behaviour.
No, .NET doesn't have any insertion-order-preserving dictionaries. You could always write your own list-based type with the relevant Add
method. This might even be one of the few places I'd consider extending an existing type:
public class KeyValueList<TKey, TValue> : List<KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>>
{
public void Add(TKey key, TValue value)
{
Add(new KeyValuePair<TKey, TValue>(key, value));
}
}
Then:
var list = new KeyValueList<string, string>
{
{ "key1", "value1"},
{ "key2", "value2"}
};
An alternative is to use composition, but my gut feeling is that this is a reasonable use of inheritance. I can't place why I'm happy in this case but not usually, mind you...
Because you do not have a dictionary you cannot use a dictionary initiailzer. You have a list so you could use a list initializer which will be the closest you could get:
var l = new List<KeyValuePair<string, string>>
{
new KeyValuePair<string, string>("key1", "value1"),
new KeyValuePair<string, string>("key2", "value2"),
};
Here's the minimum requirement for you to use dictionary initializer: the class must implement IEnumerable
and the class must have a public method Add
which takes 2 arguments (where the first argument represents the key and the second argument the value). So you could write a custom class which satisfies those requirements and you will be able to use the syntax you have shown in your question.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With