Suppose I'm in a template and I want to know if a type parameter T is an instantiation of a particular template, e.g., std::shared_ptr
:
template<typename T>
void f(T&& param)
{
if (instantiation_of(T, std::shared_ptr)) ... // if T is an instantiation of
// std::shared_ptr...
...
}
More likely I'd want to do this kind of test as part of a std::enable_if test:
template<typename T>
std::enable_if<instantiation_of<T, std::shared_ptr>::type
f(T&& param)
{
...
}
// other overloads of f for when T is not an instantiation of std::shared_ptr
Is there a way to do this? Note that the solution needs to work with all possible types and templates, including those in the standard library and in other libraries I cannot modify. My use of std::shared_ptr
above is just an example of what I might want to do.
If this is possible, how would I write the test myself, i.e., implement instantiation_of
?
There are three kinds of templates: function templates, class templates and, since C++14, variable templates.
what's the difference between template <typename T> and template <class T>? Nothing actually. typename is a designated keyword for this purpose but class is supported for backwards compatibility and historical reasons (before typename keyword was added).
C++ adds two new keywords to support templates: 'template' and 'typename'. The second keyword can always be replaced by the keyword 'class'.
vector is a template class, which can be instantiated with a type, in the format: vector<int> , vector<double> , vector<string> . The same template class can be used to handle many types, instead of repeatably writing codes for each of the type.
Why use enable_if
when simple overloading suffices?
template<typename T>
void f(std::shared_ptr<T> param)
{
// ...
}
If you really do need such a trait, I think this should get you started (only roughly tested with VC++ 2010):
#include <type_traits>
template<typename>
struct template_arg;
template<template<typename> class T, typename U>
struct template_arg<T<U>>
{
typedef U type;
};
template<typename T>
struct is_template
{
static T* make();
template<typename U>
static std::true_type check(U*, typename template_arg<U>::type* = nullptr);
static std::false_type check(...);
static bool const value =
std::is_same<std::true_type, decltype(check(make()))>::value;
};
template<
typename T,
template<typename> class,
bool Enable = is_template<T>::value
>
struct specialization_of : std::false_type
{ };
template<typename T, template<typename> class U>
struct specialization_of<T, U, true> :
std::is_same<T, U<typename template_arg<T>::type>>
{ };
A partial spec should be able to do it.
template <template <typename...> class X, typename T>
struct instantiation_of : std::false_type {};
template <template <typename...> class X, typename... Y>
struct instantiation_of<X, X<Y...>> : std::true_type {};
http://ideone.com/4n346
I actually had to look up the template template syntax, because I've basically never had cause to use it before.
Not sure how this interacts with templates like std::vector
with additional defaulted arguments.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With