According to its JavaDoc, PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor seems to be responsible for injecting the EntityManager with the annotation @PersistenceContext. It appears to imply without this bean declared in the Spring application context xml, the @PersistenceContext annotation won't work.
However, based on my experiments, this is not the truth.
<persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence
http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_1_0.xsd"
version="1.0">
<persistence-unit name="default" transaction-type="RESOURCE_LOCAL" />
</persistence>
<context:component-scan base-package="com.test.dao" />
<bean id="entityManagerFactory" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.LocalContainerEntityManagerFactoryBean">
<property name="dataSource" ref="dataSource"/>
<property name="persistenceUnitName" value="default"/>
<property name="jpaVendorAdapter">
<bean class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.vendor.HibernateJpaVendorAdapter">
<property name="showSql" value="true"/>
<property name="generateDdl" value="true"/>
<property name="databasePlatform" value="org.hibernate.dialect.DerbyDialect"/>
</bean>
</property>
</bean>
<bean id="dataSource" class="org.springframework.jdbc.datasource.DriverManagerDataSource">
<property name="driverClassName" value="org.apache.derby.jdbc.ClientDriver"/>
<property name="url" value="jdbc:derby://localhost:1527/c:\derbydb\mydb"/>
<property name="username" value="APP"/>
<property name="password" value="APP"/>
</bean>
<tx:annotation-driven/>
<bean id="transactionManager" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.JpaTransactionManager">
<property name="entityManagerFactory" ref="entityManagerFactory" />
</bean>
<!--
<bean id="persistenceAnnotation" class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" />
-->
@Repository("userDao")
public class UserDaoImpl implements UserDao {
@PersistenceContext
protected EntityManager entityManager;
@Transactional
public void save(User user) {
entityManager.persist(user);
}
}
Whether I comment or uncomment the persistenceAnnotation bean, the result is the same. It doesn't hurt to leave the bean around, but what's the use of this bean?
I am using Spring 3.0.5.
Could someone provide a scenario where taking out this bean will result in failure?
Also I am not fond of creating an empty persistence unit just to fool Spring. Luckily this problem has been addressed in Spring 3.1.0.
The PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
transparently activated by the <context:component-scan />
element. To be precise it's the <context:annotation-config />
element that activates the bean but this element in turn gets transparently activated by <context:component-scan />
.
As Oliver Gierke mentioned, org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
is automatically loaded into App Context by Spring when using annotation based configuration. One of its duties is to search the proper entity EntityManagerFactory
that would provide the EntityManager
for you @PersistenceContext
annotated properties.
If you have multiple EntityManagerFactory
beans in you spring config/context and you have @PersistenceContext
annotations without a unitName
attribute (lets say you are using a framework that comes with such a bean, and you can't touch framework code), you may run into this exception: org.springframework.beans.factory.NoUniqueBeanDefinitionException
.
I found this workaround in case you tun into this:
<bean id="org.springframework.context.annotation.internalPersistenceAnnotationProcessor"
class="org.springframework.orm.jpa.support.PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor" >
<property name="defaultPersistenceUnitName" value="entityManagerFactory"/>
</bean>
This would override the default PersistenceAnnotationBeanPostProcessor
loaded by Spring with a new one with defaultPersistenceUnitName
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With