boost::variant claims that it is a value type. Does this mean that it's safe to simply write out the raw representation of a boost::variant and load it back later, as long as it only contains POD types? Assume that it will be reloaded by code compiled by the same compiler, and same version of boost, on the same architecture.
Also, (probably) equivalently, can boost::variant be used in shared memory?
Try just including boost/serialization/variant.hpp; it does the work for you.
Regarding serialisation: It should work, yes. But why don't you use boost::variant
's visitation mechanism to write out the actual type contained in the variant?
struct variant_serializer : boost::static_visitor<void> {
template <typename T>
typename boost::enable_if< boost::is_pod<T>, void>::type
operator()( const T & t ) const {
// ... serialize here, e.g.
std::cout << t;
}
};
int main() {
const boost::variant<int,char,float,double> v( '1' );
variant_serializer s;
boost::apply_visitor( s, v );
return 0;
}
Regarding shared memory: boost::variant
does not perform heap allocations, so you can place it into shared memory just like an int
, assuming proper synchronisation, of course.
Needless to say, as you said, the above is only valid if the variant can only contain POD types.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With