Menu
i have some code that looks like this and creates a list from an existing collection
var items = items.ConvertAll(r => new
{
description = FormatDescription(r),
start = r.Milestone.HasValue ? r.Milestone.Value.ToString("yyyy-MM-ddTHH:mm:ssZ") : DateTime.Today.ToString("yyyy-MM-ddTHH:mm:ssZ"),
classname = "significance" + r.SignificanceLevel,
As you can see, right now if i dont have a start date (r.Milestone) then i put in today's date. What i really want to do if say:
Is it possible to have this conditional logic where you can remove the field all together inside this type of code?
866
From the perspective of the common language runtime, an anonymous type is no different from any other reference type, except that it cannot be cast to any type except for object.
Vincent Diamante (CC BY-SA 2.0) An anonymous type is a type that doesn't have a name. You can use an anonymous type to encapsulate a set of read-only properties inside a single unit — and you don't need to define the anonymous type beforehand.
You create anonymous types by using the new operator together with an object initializer. For more information about object initializers, see Object and Collection Initializers. The following example shows an anonymous type that is initialized with two properties named Amount and Message .
Convert anonymous type(s) into a named typePress Ctrl+Shift+R and then choose Replace Anonymous Type with Named Class.
No, you can't, mostly since it would make the anonymous class different in different executions and the class couldn't be type checked.
I'd recommend setting your Start date to null instead of a default, and checking for that later in your code.
150
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With
