I have a service which takes a driver to do the actual work. The driver itself is within the context of Symfony 2 is just another service.
To illustrate a simplified version:
services:
# The driver services.
my_scope.mailer_driver_smtp:
class: \My\Scope\Service\Driver\SmtpDriver
my_scope.mailer_driver_mock:
class: \My\Scope\Service\Driver\MockDriver
# The actual service.
my_scope.mailer:
class: \My\Scope\Service\Mailer
calls:
- [setDriver, [@my_scope.mailer_driver_smtp]]
As the above illustrates, I can inject any of the two driver services into the Mailer service. The problem is of course that the driver service being injected is hard coded. So, I want to parameterize the @my_scope.mailer_driver_smtp
.
I do this by adding an entry to my parameters.yml
my_scope_mailer_driver: my_scope.mailer_driver_smtp
I can then use this in my config.yml
and assign the parameter to the semantic exposed configuration [1]:
my_scope:
mailer:
driver: %my_scope_mailer_driver%
In the end, in the Configuration
class of my bundle I set a parameter onto the container:
$container->setParameter('my_scope.mailer.driver', $config['mailer']['driver'] );
The value for the container parameter my_scope.mailer.driver
now equals the my_scope.mailer_driver_smtp
that I set in the parameters.yml
, which is, as my understanding of it is correct, just a string.
If I now use the parameter name from the container I get an error complaining that there is no such service. E.g:
services:
my_scope.mailer:
class: \My\Scope\Service\Mailer
calls:
- [setDriver, [@my_scope.mailer.driver]]
The above will result in an error:
[Symfony\Component\DependencyInjection\Exception\ServiceNotFoundException]
The service "my_scope.mailer" has a dependency on a non-existent service "my_scope.mailer.driver"
The question now is, what is the correct syntax to inject this container parameter based service?
[1] http://symfony.com/doc/current/cookbook/bundles/extension.html
Yes, the first thing is to add the @Injectable decorator on each services you want to inject. In fact, the Injectable name is a bit insidious. It doesn't mean that the class will be "injectable" but it will decorate so the constructor parameters can be injected.
Angular provides the ability for you to inject a service into a component to give that component access to the service. The @Injectable() decorator defines a class as a service in Angular and allows Angular to inject it into a component as a dependency.
If you want to use angular services (and Http is an angular service) you must inject them as I told above as a constructor attribute to another service / component , which means if you want to use Http you need to have your service injectable. So the answer is no, you can't do it in a nice way.
This question has a similar answer here
I think the best way to use this kind of definition is to use service aliasing.
This may look like this
Acme\FooBundle\DependencyInjection\AcmeFooExtension
public function load(array $configs, ContainerBuilder $container)
{
$configuration = new Configuration;
$config = $this->processConfiguration($configuration, $configs);
$loader = new Loader\YamlFileLoader(
$container,
new FileLocator(__DIR__.'/../Resources/config')
);
$loader->load('services.yml');
$alias = $config['mailer']['driver'];
$container->setAlias('my_scope.mailer_driver', $alias);
}
This will alias the service you've defined in my_scope.mailer.driver
with my_scope.mailer_driver
, which you can use as any other service
services.yml
services:
my_scope.mailer_driver:
alias: my_scope.mailer_driver_smtp # Fallback
my_scope.mailer_driver_smtp:
class: My\Scope\Driver\Smtp
my_scope.mailer_driver_mock:
class: My\Scope\Driver\Mock
my_scope.mailer:
class: My\Scope\Mailer
arguments:
- @my_scope.mailer_driver
With such a design, the service will change whenever you change the my_scope.mailer_driver
parameter in your config.yml.
Note that the extension will throw an exception if the service doesn't exist.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With