I've read that many developers use x += 1 instead of x++ for clarity. I understand that x++ can be ambiguous for new developers and that x += 1 is always more clear, but is there any difference in efficiency between the two?
Example using for loop:
for(x = 0; x < 1000; x += 1)
vs for(x = 0; x < 1000; x++)
I understand that it's usually not that big of a deal, but if I'm repeatedly calling a function that does this sort of loop, it could add up in the long run.
Another example:
while(x < 1000) {
someArray[x];
x += 1;
}
vs
while(x < 1000) {
someArray[x++];
}
Can x++ be replaced with x += 1 without any performance loss? I'm especially concerned about the second example, because I'm using two lines instead of one.
What about incrementing an item in an array? Will someArray[i]++
be faster than doing someArray[i] += 1
when done in a large loop?
Difference between x++ and x=x+1 in Java. In x++, it increase the value of x by 1 and in x=x+1 it also increase the value of x by 1. But the question is that both are same or there is any difference between them.
x++ is a const expression that modifies the value of x (It increases it by 1 ). If you reference x++ , the expression will return the value of x before it is incremented. The expression ++x will return the value of x after it is incremented. x + 1 however, is an expression that represents the value of x + 1 .
Hope this help with ++x and x++, not sure how to answer x+=1 though. Thank you for the explanation! x+=1 is the same as x=x+1 ++x; //prefix x++; //postfix Prefix increments the value, and then proceeds with the expression. Postfix evaluates the expression and then performs the incrementing.
The only difference between the two is their return value. The former increments ( ++ ) first, then returns the value of x , thus ++x .
Any sane or insane compiler will produce identical machine code for both.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With