I know that I can reset the indices like so
df.reset_index(inplace=True)
but this will start the index from 0
. I want to start it from 1
. How do I do that without creating any extra columns and by keeping the index/reset_index functionality and options? I do not want to create a new dataframe, so inplace=True
should still apply.
Use DataFrame.reset_index() function We can use DataFrame. reset_index() to reset the index of the updated DataFrame. By default, it adds the current row index as a new column called 'index' in DataFrame, and it will create a new row index as a range of numbers starting at 0.
Pandas provides a suite of methods in order to get purely integer based indexing. The semantics follow closely python and numpy slicing. These are 0-based indexing.
Just assign directly a new index array:
df.index = np.arange(1, len(df) + 1)
Example:
In [151]: df = pd.DataFrame({'a':np.random.randn(5)}) df Out[151]: a 0 0.443638 1 0.037882 2 -0.210275 3 -0.344092 4 0.997045 In [152]: df.index = np.arange(1,len(df)+1) df Out[152]: a 1 0.443638 2 0.037882 3 -0.210275 4 -0.344092 5 0.997045
Or just:
df.index = df.index + 1
If the index is already 0 based
TIMINGS
For some reason I can't take timings on reset_index
but the following are timings on a 100,000 row df:
In [160]: %timeit df.index = df.index + 1 The slowest run took 6.45 times longer than the fastest. This could mean that an intermediate result is being cached 10000 loops, best of 3: 107 µs per loop In [161]: %timeit df.index = np.arange(1, len(df) + 1) 10000 loops, best of 3: 154 µs per loop
So without the timing for reset_index
I can't say definitively, however it looks like just adding 1 to each index value will be faster if the index is already 0
based
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With