Here is an example of a code that works perfectly:
#include<iostream>
#include<vector>
template< class D, template< class D, class A > class C, class A = std::allocator< D > >
void foo( C< D, A > *bar, C< D, A > *bas ) {
std::cout << "Ok!" << std::endl;
}
int main( ) {
std::vector< int > *sample1 = nullptr;
std::vector< int > *sample2 = nullptr;
foo( sample1, sample2 );
return( 0 );
}
In the code below, however, the compiler is unable to match std::vector< int >* with nullptr for the second parameter, even being able to deduct the template types from the first parameter.
#include<iostream>
#include<vector>
template< class D, template< class D, class A > class C, class A = std::allocator< D > >
void foo( C< D, A > *bar, C< D, A > *bas ) {
std::cout << "Ok!" << std::endl;
}
int main( ) {
std::vector< int > *sample = nullptr;
foo( sample, nullptr );
return( 0 );
}
The error message is:
$ g++ -std=c++11 nullptr.cpp -o nullptr
nullptr.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
nullptr.cpp:11:24: error: no matching function for call to ‘foo(std::vector<int>*&, std::nullptr_t)’
foo( sample, nullptr );
nullptr.cpp:11:24: note: candidate is:
nullptr.cpp:5:6: note: template<class D, template<class D, class A> class C, class A> void foo(C<D, A>*, C<D, A>*)
void foo( C< D, A > *bar, C< D, A > *bas ) {
nullptr.cpp:5:6: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
nullptr.cpp:11:24: note: mismatched types ‘C<D, A>*’ and ‘std::nullptr_t’
foo( sample, nullptr );
Why does that happen?
This is just how template deduction work: no conversion take place.
The problem is not endemic to nullptr
either, consider the extremely simple case:
#include <iostream>
struct Thing {
operator int() const { return 0; }
} thingy;
template <typename T>
void print(T l, T r) { std::cout << l << " " << r << "\n"; }
int main() {
int i = 0;
print(i, thingy);
return 0;
}
which yields:
prog.cpp: In function ‘int main()’:
prog.cpp:12:17: error: no matching function for call to ‘print(int&, Thing&)’
print(i, thingy);
^
prog.cpp:12:17: note: candidate is:
prog.cpp:8:6: note: template<class T> void print(T, T)
void print(T l, T r) { std::cout << l << " " << r << "\n"; }
^
prog.cpp:8:6: note: template argument deduction/substitution failed:
prog.cpp:12:17: note: deduced conflicting types for parameter ‘T’ (‘int’ and ‘Thing’)
print(i, thingy);
^
Thus, the conversion of nullptr
to int*
does not occur prior to template argument deduction either. As mentioned, you have two ways of solving the issue:
From the C++ standard (4.10 Pointer conversions [conv.ptr])
1 A null pointer constant is an integral constant expression (5.19) prvalue of integer type that evaluates to zero or a prvalue of type std::nullptr_t. A null pointer constant can be converted to a pointer type; the result is the null pointer value of that type and is distinguishable from every other value of object pointer or function pointer type. Such a conversion is called a null pointer conversion.
In your first exemple your two nullptr have already been converted before template argument deduction. So there is no problem you have the same type twice.
In the second one, there is a std::vector<int>
and a std::nullptr_t
and that does not match. You have to do the conversion yourself: static_cast<std::vector<int>*>(nullptr)
.
Compiler can not deduce the second argument type because std::nullptr_t
is not a pointer type.
1 The pointer literal is the keyword nullptr. It is a prvalue of type std::nullptr_t. [Note: std::nullptr_t is a distinct type that is neither a pointer type nor a pointer to member type; rather, a prvalue of this type is a null pointer constant and can be converted to a null pointer value or null member pointer value. [§2.14.7]
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With