My current attempt doesn't compile due to, I think, a problem with std::bind
not being able to deduce the return type. The actual error message is
1>Source.cpp(24): error C2783: 'enable_if::value,std::_BindRx(_fastcall _Farg0::* )(_Ftypes...) volatile const,_Rx,_Farg0,_Ftypes...>,_Types...>>::type std::bind(Rx (_fastcall _Farg0::* const )(_Ftypes...) volatile const,_Types &&...)' : could not deduce template argument for '_Ret'
Also, should I be passing the function to std::bind by value or reference? (via std::ref).
template<class InputIt, class Function>
void parallel_for_each(InputIt first, const size_t elements, Function &function)
{
unsigned int max_threads = std::max(1u, std::min(static_cast<unsigned int>(elements), std::thread::hardware_concurrency()));
std::vector<std::thread> threads;
threads.reserve(max_threads);
size_t inc = elements / max_threads;
size_t rem = elements % max_threads;
std::cout << "inc = " << inc << '\n';
auto last = first + elements;
for (; first != last; first += rem > 0 ? inc + 1, --rem : inc)
{
std::cout << "rem = " << rem << '\n';
std::cout << "first = " << *first << '\n';
threads.emplace_back(std::bind(std::for_each, first, first + inc, function));
}
for (auto &t: threads)
t.join();
}
Calling it with:
std::vector<int> numbers(678, 42);
parallel_for_each(begin(numbers), numbers.size(), [](int &x){ ++x; });
for (auto &n : numbers)
assert(n == 43);
std::cout << "Assertion tests passed\n";
Edit: I replaced the bugged for loop with:
while (first != last)
{
auto it = first;
first += rem > 0 ? --rem, inc + 1 : inc;
threads.emplace_back(std::bind(std::for_each<InputIt, Function>, it, first, function));
}
You can point manually, what template you want to use
threads.emplace_back
(
std::bind(std::for_each<InputIt, Function>, first, first + inc, function)
);
or, you can simply use lambda, without std::bind
.
Yes, you are correct, std::for_each
is a function template so you need to explicitly pick a specialization. Also, you don't actually need std::bind
, the thread constructor(emplace) supports the same syntax.
Concerning your second question, you should not pass the values by reference as you need to explicitly copy the values in case e.g.: the functor would have internal state!
There are some other problems in your implementation.
You should not take the function by reference because that will hinder passing lambdas/functors in place. Also, instead of using plain std::thread
you should use std::async
which will give you exception safety. If in your implementation a functor would throw an exception, std::terminate
would be called.
Another thing which is not directly related to multithreading is that I am getting this warning from clang:
warning: left operand of comma operator has no effect [-Wunused-value] for (; first != last; first += rem > 0 ? inc + 1, --rem : inc)
This might be the reason for the seg-fault I am getting.
In a future version you could add something like load-balancing.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With