Yesterday I faced an interesting issue after deploying my Java 8 webapp on Tomcat 8. Rather than how to solve this issue I'm more interested in understanding why that happens. But let's start from the beginning.
I have two classes defined as follows:
Foo.java
package package1; abstract class Foo { public String getFoo() { return "foo"; } }
Bar.java
package package1; public class Bar extends Foo { public String getBar() { return "bar"; } }
As you can see, they are in the same package and, ultimately, end up in the same jar, let's call it commons.jar. This jar is a dependency of my webapp (i.e. as been defined as dependency in my webapp's pom.xml).
In my webapp, there is a piece of code which does:
package package2; public class Something { ... Bar[] sortedBars = bars.stream() .sorted(Comparator.comparing(Bar::getBar) .thenComparing(Bar::getFoo)) .toArray(Bar[]::new); ... }
and when it is executed I get:
java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access class package1.Foo from class package2.Something
Playing around and experimenting I was able to avoid the error in three two ways:
changing the Foo class to be public instead of package-private;
changing the package of the Something class to be "package1" (i.e. literally the same as the Foo and Bar classes but physically different being the Something class defined in the webapp);
forcing the class-loading of Foo before executing the offending code:
try { Class<?> fooClass = Class.forName("package1.Foo"); } catch (ClassNotFoundException e) { }
Can someone give me a clear, technical explanation that justifies the issue and the above results?
When I tried the third solution I was actually using the commons.jar of the first one (the one where the Foo class is public instead of package private). My bad sorry.
Moreover, as pointed out in one of my comments, I tried to log the classloader of the Bar class and Something class, right before the offending code and the result for both was:
WebappClassLoader context: my-web-app delegate: false ----------> Parent Classloader: java.net.URLClassLoader@681a9515
Ok, I finally solved one of the mysteries!
In one of my comments I said that I wasn't able to replicate the problem by executing the offending code from a simple main created in a different package than Foo and Bar of the commons.jar. Well...Eclipse (4.5.2) and Maven (3.3.3) fooled me here!
With this simple pom:
<project xmlns="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0 http://maven.apache.org/xsd/maven-4.0.0.xsd"> <modelVersion>4.0.0</modelVersion> <groupId>my.test</groupId> <artifactId>commons</artifactId> <version>0.0.1-SNAPSHOT</version> <properties> <project.build.sourceEncoding>UTF-8</project.build.sourceEncoding> <maven.compiler.source>1.8</maven.compiler.source> <maven.compiler.target>1.8</maven.compiler.target> </properties> </project>
if I execute "mvn clean package" (as Eclipse Run Configuration) and run the main from within Eclipse I get the wonderful IllegalAccessError (cool!);
if I execute Maven -> Update project... and run the main from within Eclipse I don't get any error (not cool!).
So I switched to the command-line and I confirmed the first option: the error consistently appears regardless by whether the offending code is in the webapp or in the jar. Nice!
Then, I was able to further simplify the Something class and discovered something interesting:
package package2; import java.util.stream.Stream; import package1.Bar; public class Something { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println(new Bar().getFoo()); // "foo" Stream.of(new Bar()).map(Bar::getFoo).forEach(System.out::println); // IllegalAccessError } }
I'm about to be blasphemous here so bear with me: could it be that the Bar::getFoo method reference simply get "resolved" to the Foo::getFoo method reference and, since the Foo class is not visible in Something (being Foo package private), the IllegalAccessError is thrown?
Yes. Well, obviously you can access those methods from within the same class.
Public methods inside a package class are public to classes in the same package. But, private methods will not be accessible by classes in the same package.
Can a class declared as private be accessed outside it's package? Not possible. Can a class be declared as protected? The protected access modifier cannot be applied to class and interfaces.
I was able to reproduce the same issue compiling in Eclipse (Mars, 4.5.1) and from command line using Maven (Maven Compiler Plugin version 3.5.1, the latest at the moment).
exec:java
from console > Error exec:java
from console > No Error Compiling from command line directly with javac
(no Eclipse, no Maven, jdk-8u73) and running from command line directly with java
> Error
foo Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access class com.sample.package1.Foo from class com.sample.package2.Main at com.sample.package2.Main.lambda$MR$main$getFoo$e8593739$1(Main.java:14) at com.sample.package2.Main$$Lambda$1/2055281021.apply(Unknown Source) at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline$3$1.accept(Unknown Source) at java.util.stream.Streams$StreamBuilderImpl.forEachRemaining(Unknown Source) at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.copyInto(Unknown Source) at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.wrapAndCopyInto(Unknown Source) at java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp.evaluateSequential(Unknown Source) at java.util.stream.ForEachOps$ForEachOp$OfRef.evaluateSequential(Unknown Source) at java.util.stream.AbstractPipeline.evaluate(Unknown Source) at java.util.stream.ReferencePipeline.forEach(Unknown Source) at com.sample.package2.Main.main(Main.java:14)
Note the stacktrace above, the first (pre-java-8) invocation works fine while the second (java-8 based) throws an exception.
After some investigation, I found relevant the following links:
JDK-8068152 bug report, describing a similar issue and, above all, mentioning the following concerning the Maven Compiler Plugin and Java:
This looks like a problem induced by the provided maven plugin. The provided maven plugin (in the "plugin" directory) adds "tools.jar" to the
ClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader()
, and this is triggering the problem. I don't really see much that could (or should) be done on the javac side, sorry.In more details,
ToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler()
will look intoClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader()
to find javac classes. If it does not find javac there, it tries to find tools.jar automatically, and creates anURLClassLoader
for the tools.jar, loading the javac using this class loader. When compilation runs using this class loader, it loads the classes using this classloader. But then, when the plugins adds tools.jar to theClassLoader.getSystemClassLoader()
, the classes will begin to be loaded by the system classloader. And package-private access is denied when accessing a class from the same package but loaded by a different classloader, leading to the above error. This is made worse by maven caching the outcomes ofToolProvider.getSystemJavaCompiler()
, thanks to which running the plugin in between two compilations still leads to the error.
(NOTE: bold is mine)
Maven Compiler Plugin - Using Non-Javac Compilers, describing how you can plug a different compiler to the Maven Compiler Plugin and use it.
So, simply switching from the configuration below:
<plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId> <version>3.5.1</version> <configuration> <source>1.8</source> <target>1.8</target> </configuration> </plugin>
To the following:
<plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-compiler-plugin</artifactId> <version>3.5.1</version> <configuration> <source>1.8</source> <target>1.8</target> <compilerId>eclipse</compilerId> </configuration> <dependencies> <dependency> <groupId>org.codehaus.plexus</groupId> <artifactId>plexus-compiler-eclipse</artifactId> <version>2.7</version> </dependency> </dependencies> </plugin>
Fixed the issue, no IllegalAccessError
any more, for the same code. But doing so, we actually removed the diff between Maven and Eclipse in this context (making Maven using the Eclipse compiler), so it was kind of normal result.
So indeed, this leads to the following conclusions:
For reference, I tried also the following without much success before switching to the eclipse compiler for Maven:
executable
optionTo summarize, the JDK is coherent with Maven, and it is most probably a bug. Below some related bug reports I found:
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With