I am not sure what the difference between the different ways to HandleError.
In the asp.net mvc(default project) they put this on top of the class
[HandleError]
So I was reading some blog and the person says this
"....tells the framework that if an unhandled exception occurs in your controller that rather than showing the default Yellow Screen of Death it should instead serve up a view called Error."
http://blog.dantup.me.uk/2009/04/aspnet-mvc-handleerror-attribute-custom.html
So does that mean I should not be catching any errors(ie no try catches)?
I then was looking in a book and they have
[HandleError(ExceptionType=typeof(InsufficientMemoryException),View="About")]
public ActionResult HandleError()
{
throw new
InsufficientMemoryException();
return View("Home");
}
So they just put it on top of this ActionResult and give it an exception type. My first question is what happens if you have more then one error that you are throwing? Also I thought you should handle all errors. I know this is just a little example but should you not catch the MemoryException somewhere or does this screw up "HandleError" if you do?
I also noticed while looking at it in VS that HandleError has 2 overload methods. One of them being the above and the other being HandError().
So why is in the asp.net MVC sample file just [HandleError] and not [HandleError()]? Is one used for action methods and one used for class ones? I am assuming HandleError at top of the class one is would be like HandleError(typeof(Exception))?
and Lastly there is something called IExceptionFilter. So you is use this if you want to log all exceptions or if you have some special exceptions that you want to do something differently with?
Like if I just wanted to log all exceptions no matter what would I just make one of these and thats it but if I wanted to do something special at a NullReferenceexception I would make another one?
I was watching this tutorial http://dimecasts.net/Casts/CastDetails/37 and I don't see this "ActionFilterAttribute" they are talking about. Is this from an old version or something?
Like apparently it has 4 methods that you can use and you have to override them. In my book it only talks about these:
and they are all interfaces so no overriding. Non of them though have 4 methods. Only one or 2.
Thanks
Oh one more thing. Should you always test for every single exception? Like one of my methods can encounter 7 different exceptions. Should I test for all 7 exceptions(ie throw them) then eventually catch them and handle them(I usually just print some message out).
If so does VS2008 have something that finds the exceptions that can happen. I find it hard to tell sometimes what can be throwing an exception then I have to hunt down which ones.
"Never" trap System.Exception. You could be hiding a problem. Better to "Fail Fast."
Only trap exceptions that:
So to answer your last group of questions, I wouldn't trap those exceptions if you can check for the conditions in code. For instance, if FileNotFound is one of them, rather than trap FileNotFoundException, check for the file. If NullReference is one, check if the object is null instead of catching the Exception.
Andrew's suggestion to use ELMAH for logging unhandled exceptions, or any exception for that matter, is a great one, IMO.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With