Is there any way to apply a general requires clause to the arguments of a lambda functor?
Suppose I have two constraints C1
and C2
that I want checked against an argument. I would have expected the following to work since a similar syntax is allowed for functions:
[](auto x) requires C1<decltype(x)> && C2<decltype(x)> {
// ...
}
But this won't compile with GCC 6
In my humble opinion and based on Concepts TS §5.1.4/c4 Requires expressions [expr.prim.req] (Emphasis Mine):
A requires-expression shall appear only within a concept definition (7.1.7), or within the requires-clause of a template-declaration (Clause 14) or function declaration (8.3.5).
The above quote specifically dictates the contexts where a requires
clause can appear and lambdas is not one of them.
Concequently,
[](auto x) requires C1<decltype(x)> && C2<decltype(x)> {
// ...
}
Is not valid.
However, in §5.1.2 Lambda expressions [expr.prim.lambda] there's the following example:
template<typename T> concept bool C = true;
auto gl = [](C& a, C* b) { a = *b; }; // OK: denotes a generic lambda
So I guess, you could accomplish what you want in the following manner:
template <class T> concept bool C1 = true;
template <class T> concept bool C2 = true;
template <class T> concept bool C3 = C1<T> && C2<T>; // Define a concept that combines
// `C1` and `C2` requirements.
int main() {
auto f = [](C3 x) { /* Do what ever */ }; // OK generic lambda that requires input
// argument satisfy `C1` and `C2`
}
Live Demo
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With