I'm trying to make a function that will compare multiple variables to an integer and output a string of three letters. I was wondering if there was a way to translate this into Python. So say:
x = 0 y = 1 z = 3 mylist = [] if x or y or z == 0 : mylist.append("c") if x or y or z == 1 : mylist.append("d") if x or y or z == 2 : mylist.append("e") if x or y or z == 3 : mylist.append("f")
which would return a list of:
["c", "d", "f"]
Is something like this possible?
To test multiple variables x , y , z against a value in Python, use the expression value in {x, y, z} . Checking membership in a set has constant runtime complexity. Thus, this is the most efficient way to test multiple variables against a value.
You can assign the same value to multiple variables by using = consecutively. This is useful, for example, when initializing multiple variables to the same value. It is also possible to assign another value into one after assigning the same value.
Python Code: x = 20 y = 20 z = 20 if x == y == z == 20: print("All variables have same value!") Sample Output: All variables have same value!
To check if a variable is equal to all of multiple values, use the logical AND (&&) operator to chain multiple equality comparisons. If all comparisons return true , all values are equal to the variable. Copied! We used the logical AND (&&) operator to chain multiple equality checks.
You misunderstand how boolean expressions work; they don't work like an English sentence and guess that you are talking about the same comparison for all names here. You are looking for:
if x == 1 or y == 1 or z == 1:
x
and y
are otherwise evaluated on their own (False
if 0
, True
otherwise).
You can shorten that using a containment test against a tuple:
if 1 in (x, y, z):
or better still:
if 1 in {x, y, z}:
using a set
to take advantage of the constant-cost membership test (i.e. in
takes a fixed amount of time whatever the left-hand operand is).
When you use or
, python sees each side of the operator as separate expressions. The expression x or y == 1
is treated as first a boolean test for x
, then if that is False, the expression y == 1
is tested.
This is due to operator precedence. The or
operator has a lower precedence than the ==
test, so the latter is evaluated first.
However, even if this were not the case, and the expression x or y or z == 1
was actually interpreted as (x or y or z) == 1
instead, this would still not do what you expect it to do.
x or y or z
would evaluate to the first argument that is 'truthy', e.g. not False
, numeric 0 or empty (see boolean expressions for details on what Python considers false in a boolean context).
So for the values x = 2; y = 1; z = 0
, x or y or z
would resolve to 2
, because that is the first true-like value in the arguments. Then 2 == 1
would be False
, even though y == 1
would be True
.
The same would apply to the inverse; testing multiple values against a single variable; x == 1 or 2 or 3
would fail for the same reasons. Use x == 1 or x == 2 or x == 3
or x in {1, 2, 3}
.
Your problem is more easily addressed with a dictionary structure like:
x = 0 y = 1 z = 3 d = {0: 'c', 1:'d', 2:'e', 3:'f'} mylist = [d[k] for k in [x, y, z]]
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With