I've run into missing <router-outlet>
messages in other unit tests, but just to have a nice isolated example, I created an AuthGuard that checks if a user is logged in for certain actions.
This is the code:
canActivate(route: ActivatedRouteSnapshot, state: RouterStateSnapshot) { if (!this.authService.isLoggedIn()) { this.router.navigate(['/login']); return false; } return true; }
Now I want to write a unit test for this.
This is how I start my test:
beforeEach(() => { TestBed.configureTestingModule({ imports: [ RouterTestingModule.withRoutes([ { path: 'login', component: DummyComponent } ]) ], declarations: [ DummyComponent ], providers: [ AuthGuardService, { provide: AuthService, useClass: MockAuthService } ] }); });
I created a DummyComponent that does nothing. Now my test. Pretend that the service returns false and that it triggers this.router.navigate(['/login'])
:
it('should not let users pass when not logged in', (): void => { expect(authGuardService.canActivate(<any>{}, <any>{})).toBe(false); });
This will throw an exception with "Cannot find primary outlet to load". Obviously I can use toThrow()
instead of toBe(false)
, but that doesn't seem like a very sensible solution. Since I'm testing a service here, there is no template where I can put the <router-outlet>
tag. I could mock the router and make my own navigate function, but then what's the point of RouterTestingModule? Perhaps you even want to check that navigation worked.
We can test routing in Angular by using RouterTestingModule instead of RouterModule to provide our routes. This uses a spy implementation of Location which doesn't trigger a request for a new URL but does let us know the target URL which we can use in our test specs.
router = TestBed. get(Router); Then, in the testcase, it('should show news intially ', () => { const navigateSpy = spyOn(router,'navigate'); component.
Angular router traverses the URL tree and matches the URL segments against the paths configured in the router configuration. If a URL segment matches the path of a route, the route's child routes are matched against the remaining URL segments until all URL segments are matched.
I could mock the router and make my own navigate function, but then what's the point of RouterTestingModule? Perhaps you even want to check that navigation worked.
There's no real point. If his is just a unit test for the auth guard, then just mock and spy on the mock to check that it's navigate
method was called with the login
argument
let router = { navigate: jasmine.createSpy('navigate') } { provide: Router, useValue: router } expect(authGuardService.canActivate(<any>{}, <any>{})).toBe(false); expect(router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(['/login']);
This is how unit tests should normally be written. To try to test any actual real navigation, that would probably fall under the umbrella of end-to-end testing.
If you want to test the router without mocking it you can just inject it into your test and then spy directly on the navigate method there. The .and.stub()
will make it so the call doesn't do anything.
describe('something that navigates', () => { it('should navigate', inject([Router], (router: Router) => { spyOn(router, 'navigate').and.stub(); expect(authGuardService.canActivate(<any>{}, <any>{})).toBe(false); expect(router.navigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith(['/login']); })); });
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With