Logo Questions Linux Laravel Mysql Ubuntu Git Menu
 

How to synchronize a static variable among threads running different instances of a class in Java?

People also ask

Can static variables be shared between threads?

Static variables are indeed shared between threads, but the changes made in one thread may not be visible to another thread immediately, making it seem like there are two copies of the variable.

What will happen if 2 threads call a static synchronized method of different objects?

If you have two different instance methods marked synchronized and different threads are calling those methods concurrently on the same object, those threads will be contending for the same lock. Once one thread gets the lock all other threads are shut out of all synchronized instance methods on that object.


There are several ways to synchronize access to a static variable.

  1. Use a synchronized static method. This synchronizes on the class object.

    public class Test {
        private static int count = 0;
    
        public static synchronized void incrementCount() {
            count++;
        }
    } 
    
  2. Explicitly synchronize on the class object.

    public class Test {
        private static int count = 0;
    
        public void incrementCount() {
            synchronized (Test.class) {
                count++;
            }
        }
    } 
    
  3. Synchronize on some other static object.

    public class Test {
        private static int count = 0;
        private static final Object countLock = new Object();
    
        public void incrementCount() {
            synchronized (countLock) {
                count++;
            }
        }
    } 
    

Method 3 is the best in many cases because the lock object is not exposed outside of your class.


If you're simply sharing a counter, consider using an AtomicInteger or another suitable class from the java.util.concurrent.atomic package:

public class Test {

    private final static AtomicInteger count = new AtomicInteger(0); 

    public void foo() {  
        count.incrementAndGet();
    }  
}

Yes it is true.

If you create two instance of your class

Test t1 = new Test();
Test t2 = new Test();

Then t1.foo and t2.foo both synchronize on the same static object and hence block each other.


We can also use ReentrantLock to achieve the synchronization for static variables.

public class Test {

    private static int count = 0;
    private static final ReentrantLock reentrantLock = new ReentrantLock(); 
    public void foo() {  
        reentrantLock.lock();
        count = count + 1;
        reentrantLock.unlock();
    }  
}