I'm having trouble with the ordering of the columns in my composite primary key. I have a table that contains the following:
@Embeddable
public class MessageInfo implements Serializable {
private byte loc;
private long epochtime;
@Column(name = "loc")
public byte getLoc() {
return loc;
}
@Column(name = "epochtime")
public long getEpochtime() {
return epochtime;
}
}
It is used in this mapping:
@MappedSuperclass
@Inheritance(strategy = InheritanceType.SINGLE_TABLE)
public abstract class AbstractMessage implements Message {
private MessageInfo info;
private int blah;
@EmbeddedId
public MessageInfo getInfo() {
return info;
}
}
When I subclass AbstractMessage with a concrete @Table class hibernate creates the database and table with no errors. The problem is that hibernate is generating the composite primary key with the columns in the reverse order of what I would like.
CREATE TABLE `mydb`.`concrete_table` (
`epochtime` bigint(20) NOT NULL,
`loc` tinyint(4) NOT NULL,
`blah` smallint(6) DEFAULT NULL,
`foo` smallint(6) DEFAULT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY (`epochtime`,`loc`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=latin1;
I want the primary key to be
PRIMARY KEY (`loc`,`epochtime`)
Since I know that I will have a maximum of 10 loc's, but many epochtimes for each loc.
Any help would be appreciated =)
There is a way to do it. How hibernate chooses to order a set of columns for a primary key is alphabetical by your object names defined.
So for e.g. if you declare your objects like this:
private byte loc;
private long epochtime;
You'll get as you are getting now:
(`epochtime`,`loc`)
But if you rename them for e.g.:
private byte aloc;
private long epochtime;
It would generate it as:
(`aloc`, `epochtime`)
As a comes before e.
That's what I found out when I wanted my clustered index to be in the specific order. I know it is irritating but it's the only way I could find so that I won't have to change my schema manually.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With