I want to serialize DOM node or even whole window
to JSON.
For example:
>> serialize(document) -> { "URL": "http://stackoverflow.com/posts/2303713", "body": { "aLink": "", "attributes": [ "getNamedItem": "function getNamedItem() { [native code] }", ... ], ... "ownerDocument": "#" // recursive link here }, ... }
JSON.stringify(window) // TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON
The problem is JSON does not support circular references by default.
var obj = {} obj.me = obj JSON.stringify(obj) // TypeError: Converting circular structure to JSON
window
and DOM nodes have many of them. window === window.window
as will as document.body.ownerDocument === document
.
Also, JSON.stringify
does not serialize functions, so this is not what I'm looking for.
`dojox.json.ref.toJson()` can easily serialize object with circular references: var obj = {} obj.me = obj dojox.json.ref.toJson(obj); // {"me":{"$ref":"#"}}
Good, isn't it?
dojox.json.ref.toJson(window) // Error: Can't serialize DOM nodes
Well not good enough for me.
I'm trying to make DOM compatibility table for different browsers. For instance, Webkit supports placeholder attribute and Opera doesn't, IE 8 supports localStorage
and IE 7 doesn't, and so on.
I don't want to make thousands of test-cases. I want to make generic way for test them all.
I made a prototype NV/dom-dom-dom.com.
The "Converting circular structure to JSON" error occurs when we pass an object that contains circular references to the JSON. stringify() method. To solve the error, make sure to remove any circular references before converting the object to JSON.
Kelly M. - September 28, 2020. A circular structure is an object that references itself. In the example below, we are referencing the object (obj) as a value for the location key.
Here is the code : var container = document. querySelectorAll('. container') var json=JSON. stringify(container) {"0":{},"1":{},"2":{},"3":{}}"//result expected result: {"tagname":"div","class":"container","value":"test","childelement":[...]}
JSON supports plain objects, arrays, strings, numbers, booleans, and null . JavaScript provides methods JSON. stringify to serialize into JSON and JSON. parse to read from JSON.
http://jsonml.org/ takes a shot at a grammar for converting XHTML DOM elements into JSON. An an example:
<ul> <li style="color:red">First Item</li> <li title="Some hover text." style="color:green">Second Item</li> <li><span class="code-example-third">Third</span> Item</li> </ul>
becomes
["ul", ["li", {"style": "color:red"}, "First Item"], ["li", {"title": "Some hover text.", "style": "color:green"}, "Second Item"], ["li", ["span", {"class": "code-example-third"}, "Third"], " Item" ] ]
Haven't used it yet, but thinking about using it for a project where I want to take any web page and re-template it using mustache.js.
You could potentially traverse the DOM and generate a pure JS object representation of it and then feed it to the DojoX serializer. But, you have to first decide how you're planning to map DOM elements, their attributes and the text nodes, without ambiguity, to JS objects. For example, how would you represent the following?
<parent attr1="val1"> Some text <child attr2="val2"><grandchild/></child> </parent>
Like this?
{ tag: "parent", attributes: [ { name: "attr1", value: "val1" } ], children: [ "Some text", { tag: "child", attributes: [ { name: "attr2", value: "val2" } ], children: [ { tag: "grandchild" } ] } ] }
I think the a reason DojoX doesn't immediately support DOM serialization could exactly be this: The need to first pick a scheme for mapping DOM to JS objects. Is there a standard scheme that could be employed? Would your JS object simply mimic a DOM tree without any functions? I think you have to first define what your expectation is from "serializing DOM to JSON".
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With