I used to use fswatch v0.0.2 like so (in this instance to run django test suit when a file changed)
$>fswatch . 'python manage.py test'
this works fine.
I wanted to exclude some files that were causing the test to run more than once per save (Sublime text was saving a .tmp file, and I suspect .pyc files were also causing this)
So I upgraded fswatch to enable the -e mode.
However the way fswatch has changed which is causing me troubles - it now accepts a pipe argument like so:
$>fswatch . | xargs -n1 program
I can't figure out how to pass in arguments to the program here. e.g. this does not work:
$>fswatch . | xargs -n1 python manage.py test
nor does this:
$>fswatch . | xargs -n1 'python manage.py test'
how can I do this without packaging up my command in a bash script?
fswatch
documentation (either the Texinfo manual, or the wiki, or README
) have examples of how this is done:
$ fswatch [opts] -0 -o path ... | xargs -0 -n1 -I{} your full command goes here
Pitfalls:
xargs -0
, fswatch -0
: use it to make sure paths with newlines are interpreted correctly.fswatch -o
: use it to have fswatch
"bubble" all the events in the set into a single one printing only the number of records in the set.-I{}
: specifying a placeholder is the trick you missed for xargs
interpreting correctly your command arguments in those cases where you do not want the record (in this case, since -o
was used, the number of records in the set) to be passed down to the command being executed.Alternative answer not fighting xargs' default reason for being - passing on the output as arguments to the command to be run.
fswatch . | (while read; do python manage.py test; done)
Which is still a bit wordy/syntaxy, so I have created a super simple bash script fswatch-do
that simplifies things for me:
#!/bin/bash
(while read; do "$@"; done)
usage:
fswatch -r -o -e 'pyc' somepath | fswatch-do python manage.py test someapp.SomeAppTestCase
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With