I have a little problem understanding repository-domain object relation. Here is some information I know about domain design(they may also be wrong or not accurate). And with these in mind, I can't find a way to obtain a domain object from the repository.
In DDD the domain should know and contain only whats needed for the business and everything else must be cleared out of the domain. That's fine. And also abstracting data access from any business is a good practice too. The application doesn't need to know where we store data or how we store data. We only ask the repository to give us a domain object and it gives us the object we want or the other way is valid too, we give the repository a domain object and it sends it to the storage.
Declaring public setters for domain objects is also a very bad approach in object oriented design since we won't be able to control who is accessing what and changing what. So it is a good practice to expose only whats needed for outside of the object.
So with these in my mind, I can't figure out a way to implement my repositories. I can use any ORM or pure sql in my code and retrieve data.
But I can't create domain objects from persistence objects;
Any help will be appreciated...
There are options you have:
1. ORMs can work with private fields.
As I know, ORMs (e.g. Entity Framework, NHibernate) can set properties via non-public setters.
There is an example that proves it for Entity Framework - Entity Framework, Private Constructors and Private Setters.
If you use NHibernate your setters should be public/protected virtual
/protected internal virtual
or private
backing field can be used. You can find more information in the Property Access strategies in NHibernate SO question.
2. Reflection can be used.
It can be used to get access to private fields/properties also. It is possible to set private property via reflection.
3. It is not a bad practice to have public constructor to construct your entity.
Declaring public constructors containing all of the fields doesn't seems right. I might have several models to fill in, this means I have to define several constructors with different sets of parameters.
Your Domain Entities need only one public constructor with full list of properties they have. It is enough to have only one constructor in spite of having several models to fill in. It is a responsibility of repository to invoke constructor and map model into its parameters correctly.
Edit:
4. Automapper can be used.
The following test shows that AutoMapper can map properties via private setters.
[TestClass]
public class AutomapperTest
{
[TestMethod]
public void Test()
{
// arrange
Mapper.CreateMap<AModel, A>();
var model = new AModel { Value = 100 };
//act
var entity = Mapper.Map<A>(model);
// assert
entity.Value.Should().Be(100);
entity.Value.Should().Be(model.Value);
}
}
public class AModel
{
public int Value { get; set; }
}
public class A
{
public int Value { get; private set; }
}
It's not true you can't create domain objects with ORM not having public setters. If you're using Entity Framework, it definitely can map private properties in model first approach and you only need public getters in code first approach. I don't know how about other ORM-s.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With