I am working with data from the Twitter API and wherever users had included Emojis in their name field, they have been translated to Unicode string representations in my dataframe. The structure of my data is somewhat like this:
user_profiles <- as.data.frame(c("Susanne Bold", "Julian K. Peard <U+0001F41C>", 
"<U+0001F30A> Alexander K Miller <U+0001F30A>", "John Mason"))
colnames(user_profiles) <- "name"
which looks like this:
                                          name
1                                 Susanne Bold
2                 Julian K. Peard <U+0001F41C>
3 <U+0001F30A> Alexander K Miller <U+0001F30A>
4                                   John Mason
I am now trying to isolate the actual name into a new column using regexp:
user_profiles <- user_profiles %>%
  mutate(clean_name = str_remove_all(name, "\\<U\\+[[:alnum:]]\\>[ ]?"))
But this expression 1. seems rather complicated and 2. doesn't work for identifying the pattern. I have tried multiple variations of the regexp already, weirdly enough, grepl is able to detect the pattern with this version (which string_remove_all doesn't accept since it is missing a closing bracket):
grepl("\\<U\\+[[:alnum:]\\>[ ]?", user_profiles$name)
[1] FALSE  TRUE  TRUE FALSE
# note that the second bracket around alnum is left opened
Can somebody explain this or offer an easier solution?
Thanks a lot!
The first str_remove_all does not work because you missed the + quantifier after the alphanumeric pattern. Also, note that after <U+, only hex chars are used, so instead of [:alnum:], you can use a more precise [:xdigit:] POSIX character class.
You can use
user_profiles <- user_profiles %>%
  mutate(clean_name = str_remove_all(name, "<U\\+[[:xdigit:]]+>\\s*"))
Do not escape < and >, they are never special in any regex flavor, and in TRE regex, used with base regex functions without perl=TRUE, the \< and \> are word boundaries.
Pattern details
<U - <U string\+ - a literal +[[:xdigit:]]+ - one or more hex chars> - a > char\s* - zero or more whitespaces.Why does the grepl regex work? This is interesting, because you omitted the ] closing bracket expression boundary char, and "spoilt" the regex to match like this:
\<U\+ - a word boundary (in TRE, \< matches a left-hand word boundary) and then U+ string[[:alnum:]\>[ ]? - this is an optional bracket expression that matches one or zero chars from the set:
[:alnum:] - any alphanumeric char\ - a backslash (yes, because in TRE regex flavor, regex escape sequences are treated literally)> - a > char[ - a [ char  - a space.So, it matches <U+0 in <U+0001F41C>, for example.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With