How to redirect a program that writes to tty?

Question

This is the un-redirected output (if you don't know what module is, it doesn't matter much):

$ module help null

----------- Module Specific Help for 'null' -----------------------

        This module does absolutely nothing.
        It's meant simply as a place holder in your
        dot file initialization.

        Version 3.2.6

Suppose I'd like to redirect that to a file....

$ module help null > aaa.txt 

----------- Module Specific Help for 'null' -----------------------

        This module does absolutely nothing.
        It's meant simply as a place holder in your
        dot file initialization.

        Version 3.2.6

$ cat aaa.txt
$

Well, it must be on the stderr

$ module help null 2> aaa.txt 
        This module does absolutely nothing.
        It's meant simply as a place holder in your
        dot file initialization.

        Version 3.2.6

$ cat aaa.txt 

----------- Module Specific Help for 'null' -----------------------
$

Hey! It is resetting my redirect. This is really annoying, and I have two questions:

1. How can I achieve what I want, namely redirecting everything into my file
2. Why are they doing such a weird thing?

See also this related question.

EDIT: somebody asked in a comment, so some details. This is on AIX 5.3 at 64 bits. I have python 2.6.5 almost fully available. I have both gcc 4.1.1 and gcc 4.5.1 but not many libraries to link them against (the util-linux-ng library, which contains the script version mentioned in an answer fails to compile for the getopt part). I also have several version of IBM XL compiler xlc. The reason why I didn't specify in the first place is that I was hoping in some shell tricks, maybe with exec, not in an external program.

Answer 1

Try this:

script -q -c 'module help null' /dev/null > aaa.txt

This works in a shell script (non-interactively) using

$ script --version
script (util-linux-ng 2.16)

You may also be able to use expect.

Also see: Catching a direct redirect to /dev/tty.

Answer 2

I'm answering the second question first: as a design choice, module is an eval and they took the (questionable) choice to use stderr/tty instead of stdout/stderr to keep their side of the design easier. See here.

My solution, since I couldn't use any of the other recommended tools (e.g. script, expect) is the following python mini-wrapper:

import pty, os

pid, fd = pty.fork()
if pid == 0: # In the child process execute another command
    os.execv('./my-progr', [''])
    print "Execv never returns :-)"
else:
    while True:
        try:
            print os.read(fd,65536),
        except OSError:
            break