I have the following sigaction
handler function
void signal_term_handler(int sig)
{
printf("EXIT :TERM signal Received!\n");
int rc = flock(pid_file, LOCK_UN | LOCK_NB);
if(rc) {
char *piderr = "PID file unlock failed!";
fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", piderr);
printf(piderr);
}
abort();
}
Someone told me that flock
and printf
aren't async-signal-safe. And I could not find an alternate async-signal-safe function for flock
in this list.
and according to the above link:
when a signal interrupts an unsafe function and the signal-catching function calls an unsafe function, the behavior is undefined
Is there a way to make flock
async-signal-safe? Or is there another solution to execute flock
when I receive TERM
signal?
You can use fcntl() as an alternative to flock().
flock()
is generally async-signal-safe because it is a system call. Its semantics make it hard to implement it differently. It is not in POSIX's list of async-signal-safe functions because it is not in POSIX at all.
You likely do not need the explicit unlock because flock()
locks are released automatically when all file descriptors referring to the open file description are closed.
The printf()
and fprintf()
calls should be replaced with appropriate write()
calls. The stdio functions are not in the list of async-signal-safe functions and are often strongly async-signal-unsafe.
The abort()
call is probably best replaced by setting the signal to the default action and resending it to self; this way, shells know that your program exited because of the signal and can abort command sequences when appropriate.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With