Python generators are very useful. They have advantages over functions that return lists. However, you could len(list_returning_function())
. Is there a way to len(generator_function())
?
UPDATE:
Of course len(list(generator_function()))
would work.....
I'm trying to use a generator I've created inside a new generator I'm creating. As part of the calculation in the new generator it needs to know the length of the old one. However I would like to keep both of them together with the same properties as a generator, specifically - not maintain the entire list in memory as it may be very long.
UPDATE 2:
Assume the generator knows it's target length even from the first step. Also, there's no reason to maintain the len()
syntax. Example - if functions in Python are objects, couldn't I assign the length to a variable of this object that would be accessible to the new generator?
To reset a generator object in Python, we can use the itertools. tee method. to call itertools. tee with generator y to get a 2nd version of the generator.
A Python generator is a function that produces a sequence of results. It works by maintaining its local state, so that the function can resume again exactly where it left off when called subsequent times. Thus, you can think of a generator as something like a powerful iterator.
A generator expression is an expression that returns a generator object. Basically, a generator function is a function that contains a yield statement and returns a generator object.
The conversion to list
that's been suggested in the other answers is the best way if you still want to process the generator elements afterwards, but has one flaw: It uses O(n) memory. You can count the elements in a generator without using that much memory with:
sum(1 for x in generator)
Of course, be aware that this might be slower than len(list(generator))
in common Python implementations, and if the generators are long enough for the memory complexity to matter, the operation would take quite some time. Still, I personally prefer this solution as it describes what I want to get, and it doesn't give me anything extra that's not required (such as a list of all the elements).
Also listen to delnan's advice: If you're discarding the output of the generator it is very likely that there is a way to calculate the number of elements without running it, or by counting them in another manner.
Generators have no length, they aren't collections after all.
Generators are functions with a internal state (and fancy syntax). You can repeatedly call them to get a sequence of values, so you can use them in loop. But they don't contain any elements, so asking for the length of a generator is like asking for the length of a function.
if functions in Python are objects, couldn't I assign the length to a variable of this object that would be accessible to the new generator?
Functions are objects, but you cannot assign new attributes to them. The reason is probably to keep such a basic object as efficient as possible.
You can however simply return (generator, length)
pairs from your functions or wrap the generator in a simple object like this:
class GeneratorLen(object): def __init__(self, gen, length): self.gen = gen self.length = length def __len__(self): return self.length def __iter__(self): return self.gen g = some_generator() h = GeneratorLen(g, 1) print len(h), list(h)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With