Imagine you have a rating like
Rating = OneStar | TwoStars | ThreeStars | FourStars | FiveStars
What is the best way to instanciate/implement "Ord" for such an algebraic data type in Haskell?
This is a type where we specify the shape of each of the elements. Wikipedia has a thorough discussion. "Algebraic" refers to the property that an Algebraic Data Type is created by "algebraic" operations. The "algebra" here is "sums" and "products": "sum" is alternation ( A | B , meaning A or B but not both)
Haskell has three basic ways to declare a new type: The data declaration, which defines new data types. The type declaration for type synonyms, that is, alternative names for existing types. The newtype declaration, which defines new data types equivalent to existing ones.
In Haskell, every statement is considered as a mathematical expression and the category of this expression is called as a Type. You can say that "Type" is the data type of the expression used at compile time. To learn more about the Type, we will use the ":t" command.
The best way would be to just add deriving (Eq, Ord)
to the type's definition.
Since you listed your constructors in ascending order, the derived Ord
instance will give you exactly the order you want.
However, if changing the order in the definition is not an option for some reason you can still derive Eq, since for that the order does not matter. Given an instance of Eq, we can manually write an instance for Ord. The most succinct way to define compare would probably be to spell out all the combinations for which compare should return LT and then simply use compare x y | x == y = Eq; compare _ _ = GT for the remaining combinations.
As has been mention, you can derive Eq
and Ord
. Or you could derive Enum
and then do
instance Eq Rating where
x == y = fromEnum x == fromEnum y
Or just spell it all out
instance Eq Rating where
OneStar == OneStar = True
TwoStar == TwoStar = True
...
_ == _ = False
For anyone wondering, here is the complete, explicit, boilerplate implementation:
Using roman numerals.
Using case
for ease of reading.
data RN = I | II | III | IV | V
instance Eq RN where
I == I = True
I == _ = False
II == II = True
II == _ = False
III == III = True
III == _ = False
IV == IV = True
IV == _ = False
V == V = True
V == _ = False
instance Ord RN where
compare I x = case x of
I -> EQ
_ -> LT
compare II x = case x of
I -> GT
II -> EQ
_ -> LT
compare III x = case x of
III -> EQ
_ -> GT
_ -> LT
compare IV x = case x of
V -> LT
IV -> EQ
_ -> GT
compare V x = case x of
V -> EQ
_ -> GT
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With