Let's say I have the following local repository with a commit tree like this:
master --> a \ \ develop c --> d \ \ feature f --> g --> h
master
is my this is the latest stable release code, develop
is my this is the 'next' release code, and feature
is a new feature being prepared for develop
.
Using hooks, I want to be able to refuse pushes to feature
to my remote repository, unless commit f
is a direct descendant of develop
HEAD. I.e., the commit tree looks like this, because feature has been git rebase
on d
.
master --> a \ \ develop c --> d \ \ feature f --> g --> h
So is it possible to:
feature
?f
is a descendant of?From there I would check what HEAD of the parent branch is, and see if f
predecessor matches the parent branch HEAD, to determine if the feature needs to be rebased.
Parent Branch means the main branch from where the Additional Profile is trading.
When you use the git merge command to merge a branch/commit into your current branch, it joins their development histories together in a new commit. This new commit records both as its parents; the branch/commit you're merging in and the branch you are on when the merge occurs.
Assuming that the remote repository has a copy of the develop branch (your initial description describes it in a local repository, but it sounds like it also exists in the remote), you should be able to achieve what I think you want, but the approach is a bit different from what you have envisioned.
Git’s history is based on a DAG of commits. Branches (and “refs” in general) are just transient labels that point to specific commits in the continually growing commit DAG. As such, the relationship between branches can vary over time, but the relationship between commits does not.
---o---1 foo \ 2---3---o bar \ 4 \ 5---6 baz
It looks like baz
is based on (an old version of) bar
? But what if we delete bar
?
---o---1 foo \ 2---3 \ 4 \ 5---6 baz
Now it looks like baz
is based on foo
. But the ancestry of baz
did not change. We just removed a label (and the resulting dangling commit). And what if we add a new label at 4
?
---o---1 foo \ 2---3 \ 4 quux \ 5---6 baz
Now it looks like baz
is based on quux
. Still, the ancestry did not change, only the labels changed.
If, however, we were asking “is commit 6
a descendent of commit 3
?” (assuming 3
and 6
are full SHA-1 commit names), then the answer would be “yes”, whether the bar
and quux
labels are present or not.
So, you could ask questions like “is the pushed commit a descendent of the current tip of the develop branch?”, but you can not reliably ask “what is the parent branch of the pushed commit?”.
A mostly reliable question that seems to get close to what you want is:
For all the pushed commit’s ancestors (excluding the current tip of develop and its ancestors), that have the current tip of develop as a parent:
- does at least one such commit exist?
- are all such commits single-parent commits?
Which could be implemented as:
pushedrev=... basename=develop if ! baserev="$(git rev-parse --verify refs/heads/"$basename" 2>/dev/null)"; then echo "'$basename' is missing, call for help!" exit 1 fi parents_of_children_of_base="$( git rev-list --pretty=tformat:%P "$pushedrev" --not "$baserev" | grep -F "$baserev" )" case ",$parents_of_children_of_base" in ,) echo "must descend from tip of '$basename'" exit 1 ;; ,*\ *) echo "must not merge tip of '$basename' (rebase instead)" exit 1 ;; ,*) exit 0 ;; esac
This will cover some of what you want restricted, but maybe not everything.
For reference, here is an extended example history:
A master \ \ o-----J \ / \ \ | o---K---L \ |/ C--------------D develop \ |\ F---G---H | F'--G'--H' | |\ | | o---o---o---N \ \ \ \ \ \ o---o---P \ \ R---S
The above code could be used to reject H
and S
while accepting H'
, J
, K
, or N
, but it would also accept L
and P
(they involve merges, but they do not merge the tip of develop).
To also reject L
and P
, you can change the question and ask
For all the pushed commit’s ancestors (excluding the current tip of develop and its ancestors):
- are there any commits with two parents?
- if not, does at least one such commit have the current tip of develop its (only) parent?
pushedrev=... basename=develop if ! baserev="$(git rev-parse --verify refs/heads/"$basename" 2>/dev/null)"; then echo "'$basename' is missing, call for help!" exit 1 fi parents_of_commits_beyond_base="$( git rev-list --pretty=tformat:%P "$pushedrev" --not "$baserev" | grep -v '^commit ' )" case "$parents_of_commits_beyond_base" in *\ *) echo "must not push merge commits (rebase instead)" exit 1 ;; *"$baserev"*) exit 0 ;; *) echo "must descend from tip of '$basename'" exit 1 ;; esac
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With