How to automatically extract the well fitted linear part of a curve which the R^2 is not ideal for the whole curve?
for example What I have:
data.lm
x y
1 1 1
2 2 8
3 3 3
4 4 4
5 5 5
6 6 6
7 7 7
8 8 5
9 9 2
10 10 7
rg.lm<- lm(y~x, data.lm) rg.lm
Coefficients:
(Intercept) x
3.7333 0.1939
summary(rg.lm)
Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-3.4788 -1.1136 0.0061 1.2712 3.8788
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 3.7333 1.6111 2.317 0.0491 *
x 0.1939 0.2597 0.747 0.4765
Residual standard error: 2.358 on 8 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.06519, Adjusted R-squared: -0.05166
F-statistic: 0.5579 on 1 and 8 DF, p-value: 0.4765
What I expect:
data.lm.ex<- unknown.function (data.lm) data.lm.ex
x y
1 3 3
2 4 4
3 5 5
4 6 6
7 7 7
Another example comes from real data:
data.lm
time OD
1 0 2.175
2 30 2.134
3 60 2.189
4 90 2.141
5 120 2.854
6 150 3.331
7 180 3.642
8 210 4.333
9 240 4.987
10 270 5.093
11 300 4.943
12 330 5.198
13 360 4.804
summary(lm(data.lm))$r.squared
[1] 0.8981063
summary(lm(data.lm[4:9,]))$r.squared
[1] 0.9886727
As it is shown above, the interval between line 4 to 9 has an absolutely higher r^2 than the whole curve. And would you please let me know the automatical way to find the interval which highest r^2 is presented and with at least certain number of points (due to 2 points always present the r^2=1.0)?
To determine the domain, identify the set of all the x-coordinates on the function's graph. To determine the range, identify the set of all y-coordinates. In addition, ask yourself what are the greatest/least x- and y-values. These values will be your boundary numbers.
While the terms linear and nonlinear have standard definitions in statistics, the term curvilinear does not have a standard meaning. It generally is used to describe a curve that is smooth (no discontinuities) but the underlying mathematical model could be either linear or nonlinear.
The formal term to describe a straight line graph is linear, whether or not it goes through the origin, and the relationship between the two variables is called a linear relationship. Similarly, the relationship shown by a curved graph is called non-linear.
Select “Linear” under “Trendline Options”. Also select “Display Equation on Chart” and “Display R-Squared Value on Chart”. You should now see a dotted line drawn through your data points and a text box next to it with the best-fit linear equation and the R2 value.
This should work:
a <- cbind(1:10, c(1,8,3:7,5,2,7))
tmp <- rle(diff(a[,2]))
ml <- max(tmp$lengths)
i1 <- which(ml==tmp$lengths)[1]
a[seq(i1,i1+ml),]
Update
a <- data.frame(x=c(0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330, 360),
y=c(2.175, 2.134, 2.189, 2.141, 2.854, 3.331, 3.642, 4.333, 4.987, 5.093, 4.943, 5.198, 4.804))
b <- diff(a[,2])/diff(a[,1])
b.k <- kmeans(b,3)
b.max <- max(abs(b.k$centers))
b.v <- which(b.k$cluster == match(b.max, b.k$centers))
RES <- a[b.v,]
plot(a)
points(RES,pch=15)
abline(coef(lm(y~x,RES)), col="red")
A refined version:
library(zoo)
a <- data.frame(x=c(0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300, 330, 360),
y=c(2.175, 2.134, 2.189, 2.141, 2.854, 3.331, 3.642, 4.333, 4.987, 5.093, 4.943, 5.198, 4.804))
f <- function (d) {
m <- lm(y~x, as.data.frame(d))
return(coef(m)[2])
}
co <- rollapply(a, 3, f, by.column=F)
co.cl <- kmeans(co, 2)
b.points <- which(co.cl$cluster == match(max(co.cl$centers), co.cl$centers))+1
RES <- a[b.points,]
plot(a)
points(RES,pch=15,col="red")
abline(lm(y~x,RES),col="blue")
[
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With