I've got a program which works in g++ and clang, using a nested initializer_list. In Visual C++, the 1D case works, but a 2D nested initializer_list does not. Is there a trick to make Visual C++ work, or is this maybe a bug in their implementation?
Here's my example code. It works in Visual C++ 2013 if I remove the annotated line.
#include <iostream>
#include <initializer_list>
using namespace std;
template<class T>
void print(T val) {
cout << val;
}
template<class T>
void print(initializer_list<T> lst) {
bool first = true;
cout << "[";
for (auto i : lst) {
if (!first) cout << ", ";
print(i);
first = false;
}
cout << "]";
}
template<class T>
void print(initializer_list<initializer_list<T>> lst) {
bool first = true;
cout << "[";
for (auto i : lst) {
if (!first) cout << ", ";
print(i);
first = false;
}
cout << "]";
}
int main()
{
print({1, 2, 3});
cout << endl;
// Without this line, Visual C++ 2013 is happy
print({{1, 2}, {3, 4, 5}, {6}});
}
template<class T>
std::initializer_list<T> list( std::initializer_list<T>&& l ) { return std::move(l); }
or something similar may at least give you the workaround:
print( { list({1,2}), list({3,2,1}) } );
the syntax can be messed around with (l*{2,1}
) in a few ways as well.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With