In an attempt to make a sane(r) alternative to Haskell's numeric type system, the devs of numeric-prelude slipped up and decided to name all of their type classes C
. Aside from making the docs totally confusing, this means that I have to fully qualify all uses of the typeclasses:
import qualified Algebra.Additive (C)
import qualified Algebra.Ring (C)
...
newtype Foo a = Foo a
instance (Algebra.Additive.C a) => Algebra.Additive.C (Foo a) where ...
myadd :: (Algebra.Additive.C a) => a -> a -> a
myadd a b = ...
Also, since NumericPrelude has finer grained typeclasses, I usually have to import several different NumericPrelude modules. I can simplify this a little by defining top-level constraint synonyms:
{-# LANGUAGE ConstraintKinds #-}
module NPSynonyms (Additive) where
import qualified Algebra.Additive (C)
type Additive a = (Algebra.Additive.C a)
which allows me to make sane functions:
myadd :: (Additive a) => a -> a -> a
myadd a b = ...
However, when I need to define an instance, I still have to (also) import the original NumericPrelude class:
{-# LANGUAGE ConstraintKinds #-}
import NPSynonyms
import Algebra.Additive (C)
newtype Foo a = Foo a
instance (Additive a) => Algebra.Additive.C (Foo a) where ...
So instead of making Additive
a type synonym with kind Constraint
, what I'd really like is to define a typeclass synonym for the typeclass Algebra.Additive.C
. Is there any way to do this in GHC 7.8, or is there any sane alternative?
What's a typeclass in Haskell? A typeclass defines a set of methods that is shared across multiple types. For a type to belong to a typeclass, it needs to implement the methods of that typeclass. These implementations are ad-hoc: methods can have different implementations for different types.
The second line, deriving (Eq, Show) , is called the deriving clause; it specifies that we want the compiler to automatically generate instances of the Eq and Show classes for our Pair type. The Haskell Report defines a handful of classes for which instances can be automatically generated.
An instance of a class is an individual object which belongs to that class. In Haskell, the class system is (roughly speaking) a way to group similar types. (This is the reason we call them "type classes"). An instance of a class is an individual type which belongs to that class.
you have to fully qualify
No, not fully qualify. Consider:
import qualified Algebra.Additive as Add
myadd :: Add.C a => a -> a -> a
That looks fairly readable to me.
EDIT:
Also consider making a superclass and treating that as an alias:
class (Add.C a, Ring.C a) => Num a where
instance Num Int
instance Num Word
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With