It is pretty clear that a web server has to decode any escaped unreserved character (such as alphanums, etc.) to do the URI comparison. For example, http://www.example.com/~user/index.htm
shall be identical to http://www.example.com/%7Euser/index.htm
.
My question is, what are we gonna do with the escaped reserved characters?
An example would be %2F
, or /
. If there is an %2F
in the request URI, should the parser of web server replace it with a /
? In the above example, it would mean that http://www.example.com/~user%2Findex.htm
would be the same as http://www.example.com/~user/index.htm
? Although I tried it on an Apache server (2.2.17 Unix) and it looks like it gives a "404 Not Found" error.
So does that mean %2F
and other escaped reserved characters shall be left alone (at least before the URI comparison)?
There are two places in RFC 2616 (HTTP 1.1) mentioning the escape decoding issue:
The Request-URI is transmitted in the format specified in section 3.2.1. If the Request-URI is encoded using the “% HEX HEX” encoding [42], the origin server MUST decode the Request-URI in order to properly interpret the request. Servers SHOULD respond to invalid Request-URIs with an appropriate status code.
and
Characters other than those in the “reserved” and “unsafe” sets (see RFC 2396 [42]) are equivalent to their “"%" HEX HEX” encoding.
(according to http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/2 "unsafe" is a mistake and shall be removed from the spec. So we are only looking at "reserved" here.)
FYI, the definition of such characters in RFC 2396:
reserved = ";" | "/" | "?" | ":" | "@" | "&" | "=" | "+" | "$" | ","
unreserved = alphanum | mark
mark = "-" | "_" | "." | "!" | "˜" | "*" | "’" | "(" | ")"
tl;dr:
Decode percent-encoded unreserved characters,
keep percent-encoded reserved characters.
The URI standard is STD 66, which currently is RFC 3986.
Section 6 is about Normalization and Comparison, where section 6.2.2.2 explains what to do with percent-encoded octets:
These URIs should be normalized by decoding any percent-encoded octet that corresponds to an unreserved character […]
As explicitly stated in section 2 (bold emphasis mine):
Unreserved characters:
URIs that differ in the replacement of an unreserved character with its corresponding percent-encoded US-ASCII octet are equivalent
Reserved characters:
URIs that differ in the replacement of a reserved character with its corresponding percent-encoded octet are not equivalent.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With