I've been working with the Scala Akka library and have come across a bit of a problem. As the title says, I need to convert Map[A, Future[B]]
to Future[Map[A,B]]
. I know that one can use Future.sequence
for Iterables like Lists, but that doesn't work in this case.
I was wondering: is there a clean way in Scala to make this conversion?
See if this works for you:
val map = Map("a" -> future{1}, "b" -> future{2}, "c" -> future{3}) val fut = Future.sequence(map.map(entry => entry._2.map(i => (entry._1, i)))).map(_.toMap)
The idea is to map the map to an Iterable
for a Tuple
of the key of the map and the result of the future tied to that key. From there you can sequence
that Iterable
and then once you have the aggregate Future
, map it and convert that Iterable
of Tuples
to a map via toMap
.
Now, an alternative to this approach is to try and do something similar to what the sequence
function is doing, with a couple of tweaks. You could write a sequenceMap
function like so:
def sequenceMap[A, B](in: Map[B, Future[A]])(implicit executor: ExecutionContext): Future[Map[B, A]] = { val mb = new MapBuilder[B,A, Map[B,A]](Map()) in.foldLeft(Promise.successful(mb).future) { (fr, fa) => for (r <- fr; a <- fa._2.asInstanceOf[Future[A]]) yield (r += ((fa._1, a))) } map (_.result) }
And then use it in an example like this:
val map = Map("a" -> future{1}, "b" -> future{2}, "c" -> future{3}) val fut = sequenceMap(map) fut onComplete{ case Success(m) => println(m) case Failure(ex) => ex.printStackTrace() }
This might be slightly more efficient than the first example as it creates less intermediate collections and has less hits to the ExecutionContext
.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With