Suppose I have an unconstrained generic method that works on all types supporting equality. It performs pairwise equality checks and so works in O(n2):
public static int CountDuplicates<T>(IList<T> list)
{
/* ... */
}
I also have a constrained generic method that only works with types supporting sorting. It starts from sorting the list in O(n log n), and then counts all duplicates in one pass:
public static int CountDuplicatesFast<T>(IList<T> list)
where T : IComparable<T>
{
/* ... */
}
So, a caller can choose to invoke the fast method if it is statically known that the type of elements of the list supports ordering. It might happen that the caller itself works with generic IList<T>
where T is unconstrained, so its only option to invoke the first (slow) method.
Now, I want the first method to check at runtime if the type T
actually implements the interface IComparable<T>
and if so, invoke the fast method:
public static int CountDuplicates<T>(IList<T> list)
{
if (typeof(IComparable<T>).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T)))
{
return CountDuplicatesFast(list);
}
else
{
/* use the slow algorithm */
}
}
The problem is the compiler rejects the invocation CountDuplicatesFast(list)
:
error CS0314: The type 'T' cannot be used as type parameter 'T' in the generic type or method 'Program.CountDuplicatesFast<T>(System.Collections.Generic.IList<T>)'. There is no boxing conversion or type parameter conversion from 'T' to 'System.IComparable<T>'.
Is it possible to persuade the compiler to trust me that I know what I am doing, and to skip the constraint check?
There can be more than one constraint associated with a type parameter. When this is the case, use a comma-separated list of constraints. In this list, the first constraint must be class or struct or the base class.
The where clause in a generic definition specifies constraints on the types that are used as arguments for type parameters in a generic type, method, delegate, or local function. Constraints can specify interfaces, base classes, or require a generic type to be a reference, value, or unmanaged type.
You can constrain the generic type by interface, thereby allowing only classes that implement that interface or classes that inherit from classes that implement the interface as the type parameter. The code below constrains a class to an interface.
You can use a helper class and dynamic
type to skip compile-time checks:
sealed class CountDuplicatesFastCaller
{
public int Call<T>(IList<T> list) where T : IComparable<T>
{
return CountDuplicatesFast(list);
}
}
public static int CountDuplicates<T>(IList<T> list)
{
if (typeof (IComparable<T>).IsAssignableFrom(typeof (T)))
{
return ((dynamic) new CountDuplicatesFastCaller()).Call(list);
}
else
{
/* use the slow algorithm */
}
}
This should be faster than pure reflection because of DLR caching mechanisms.
Here's a way to do it using dynamic
:
if (typeof(IComparable<T>).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T)))
{
return CountDuplicatesFast((dynamic)list);
}
Or with reflection:
if (typeof(IComparable<T>).IsAssignableFrom(typeof(T)))
{
var method = typeof(MyType).GetMethod("CountDuplicatesFast");
var generic = method.MakeGenericMethod(typeof(T));
return (int)generic.Invoke(null, new object[] { list });
}
I don't think that there's a way to do this statically (i.e. without reflection or dynamic
).
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With