Let's import the functions particularly instead of the whole file. To avoid circular import errors, you can move ```from module import X``` to a place it is needed.
also just as a reference, it seems circular imports are allowed on python 3.5 (and probably beyond) but not 3.4 (and probably bellow).
In simplest terms, a circular import occurs when module A tries to import and use an object from module B, while module B tries to import and use an object from module A. You can see it on on an example with simple modules a.py and b.py: # a.py snippet. print('First line of a.py') from package.
Consider the following example python package where a.py
and b.py
depend on each other:
/package
__init__.py
a.py
b.py
Circular import dependencies typically fall into two categories depending on what you're trying to import and where you're using it inside each module. (And whether you're using python 2 or 3).
In some cases, just importing a module with a circular import dependency can result in errors even if you're not referencing anything from the imported module.
There are several standard ways to import a module in python
import package.a # (1) Absolute import
import package.a as a_mod # (2) Absolute import bound to different name
from package import a # (3) Alternate absolute import
import a # (4) Implicit relative import (deprecated, python 2 only)
from . import a # (5) Explicit relative import
Unfortunately, only the 1st and 4th options actually work when you
have circular dependencies (the rest all raise ImportError
or AttributeError
). In general, you shouldn't be using the
4th syntax, since it only works in python2 and runs the risk of
clashing with other 3rd party modules. So really, only the first
syntax is guaranteed to work.
EDIT: The
ImportError
andAttributeError
issues only occur in python 2. In python 3 the import machinery has been rewritten and all of these import statements (with the exception of 4) will work, even with circular dependencies. While the solutions in this section may help refactoring python 3 code, they are mainly intended for people using python 2.
Just use the first import syntax above. The downside to this method is that the import names can get super long for large packages.
In a.py
import package.b
In b.py
import package.a
I've seen this method used in lots of packages, but it still feels hacky to me, and I dislike that I can't look at the top of a module and see all its dependencies, I have to go searching through all the functions as well.
In a.py
def func():
from package import b
In b.py
def func():
from package import a
This also works, but has the same problem as the first method, where all the package and submodule calls get super long. It also has two major flaws -- it forces all the submodules to be imported, even if you're only using one or two, and you still can't look at any of the submodules and quickly see their dependencies at the top, you have to go sifting through functions.
In __init__.py
from . import a
from . import b
In a.py
import package
def func():
package.b.some_object()
In b.py
import package
def func():
package.a.some_object()
Now, while you may be able to import a module with a circular import dependency, you won't be able to import any objects defined in the module or actually be able to reference that imported module anywhere in the top level of the module where you're importing it. You can, however, use the imported module inside functions and code blocks that don't get run on import.
For example, this will work:
package/a.py
import package.b
def func_a():
return "a"
package/b.py
import package.a
def func_b():
# Notice how package.a is only referenced *inside* a function
# and not the top level of the module.
return package.a.func_a() + "b"
But this won't work
package/a.py
import package.b
class A(object):
pass
package/b.py
import package.a
# package.a is referenced at the top level of the module
class B(package.a.A):
pass
You'll get an exception
AttributeError: module 'package' has no attribute 'a'
Generally, in most valid cases of circular dependencies, it's possible to refactor or reorganize the code to prevent these errors and move module references inside a code block.
Only import the module, don't import from the module:
Consider a.py
:
import b
class A:
def bar(self):
return b.B()
and b.py
:
import a
class B:
def bar(self):
return a.A()
This works perfectly fine.
We do a combination of absolute imports and functions for better reading and shorter access strings.
main/sub/a.py
import main.sub.b
b_mod = lambda: main.sub.b
class A():
def __init__(self):
print('in class "A":', b_mod().B.__name__)
main/sub/b.py
import main.sub.a
a_mod = lambda: main.sub.a
class B():
def __init__(self):
print('in class "B":', a_mod().A.__name__)
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With