I have a template class that stores an array of numbers and I want to apply existing (scalar) functions to every element. For example, if we assume my class is std::vector, then I want to be able to call (for example) the std::cos function on all elements.
Maybe a call would look like this:
std::vector<float> A(3, 0.1f);
std::vector<float> B = vector_function(std::cos, A);
N.B. I must also handle std::complex<> types (for which the appropriate complex std::cos function is called).
I found this answer which suggests taking the function type as a template parameter:
template<typename T, typename F>
std::vector<T> vector_function(F func, std::vector<T> x)
However, I couldn't get this to work at all (maybe because functions like std::sin and std::cos are both templated and overloaded?).
I also tried using std::transform
, but this quickly became very ugly. For non-complex types, I managed to get it working using a typedef:
std::vector<float> A(2, -1.23f);
typedef float (*func_ptr)(float);
std::transform(A.begin(), A.end(), A.begin(), (func_ptr) std::abs);
However, attempting the same trick with std::complex<> types caused a run-time crash.
Is there a nice way to get this working? I have been stuck on this for ages.
To apply a function to every item in an array, use array_map() . This will return a new array. $array = array(1,2,3,4,5); //each array item is iterated over and gets stored in the function parameter. $newArray = array_map(function($item) { return $item + 1; }, $array);
Templates in c++ is defined as a blueprint or formula for creating a generic class or a function. To simply put, you can create a single function or single class to work with different data types using templates. C++ template is also known as generic functions or classes which is a very powerful feature in C++.
The act of creating a new definition of a function, class, or member of a class from a template declaration and one or more template arguments is called template instantiation. The definition created from a template instantiation is called a specialization.
Here is the assignment: Create a class template that contains two private data members: T * array and int size. The class uses a constructor to allocate the array based on the size entered. There is member function that allows the user to fill in the array based on the size.
I still think you should use std::transform
:
template <class OutputIter, class UnaryFunction>
void apply_pointwise(OutputIter first, OutputIter last, UnaryFunction f)
{
std::transform(first, last, first, f);
}
This function works not only for std::vector
types but indeed any container that has a begin()
and end()
member function, and it even works for C-style arrays with the help of the free functions std::begin
and std::end
. The unary function may be any free function, a functor object, a lambda expression or even member functions of a class.
As for the problem with std::sin
, this free function is templated and so the compiler cannot know which template instantiation you need.
If you have access to C++11, then simply use a lambda expression:
std::vector<float> v;
// ...
apply_pointwise(v.begin(), v.end(), [](const float f)
{
return std::sin(f);
});
This way, the compiler knows that it should substitute T=float
as the template parameter.
If you can use C functions, you can also use the function sinf
, which is not templated and takes a float
as a parameter:
apply_pointwise(v.begin(), v.end(), sinf);
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With