What is the proper way to annotate a function argument that expects a class object instead of an instance of that class?
In the example below, some_class
argument is expected to be a type instance (which is a class), but the problem here is that type
is too broad:
def construct(some_class: type, related_data:Dict[str, Any]) -> Any: ...
In the case where some_class
expects a specific set of types objects, using type
does not help at all. The typing
module might be in need of a Class generic that does this:
def construct(some_class: Class[Union[Foo, Bar, Baz]], related_data:Dict[str, Any]) -> Union[Foo, Bar, Baz]: ...
In the example above, some_class
is the Foo
, Bar
or Faz
class, not an instance of it. It should not matter their positions in the class tree because some_class: Class[Foo]
should also be a valid case. Therefore,
# classes are callable, so it is OK inst = some_class(**related_data)
or
# instances does not have __name__ clsname = some_class.__name__
or
# an operation that only Foo, Bar and Baz can perform. some_class.a_common_classmethod()
should be OK to mypy, pytype, PyCharm, etc.
How can this be done with current implementation (Python 3.6 or earlier)?
Type annotations — also known as type signatures — are used to indicate the datatypes of variables and input/outputs of functions and methods. In many languages, datatypes are explicitly stated.
An instance of a class is an object. It is also known as a class object or class instance. As such, instantiation may be referred to as construction. Whenever values vary from one object to another, they are called instance variables.
To get the class name of an instance in Python: Use the type() function and __name__ to get the type or class of the Object/Instance.
To annotate an object that is a class, use typing.Type
. For example, this would tell the type checker that some_class
is class Foo
or any of its subclasses:
from typing import Type class Foo: ... class Bar(Foo): ... class Baz: ... some_class: Type[Foo] some_class = Foo # ok some_class = Bar # ok some_class = Baz # error some_class = Foo() # error
Note that Type[Union[Foo, Bar, Baz]]
and Union[Type[Foo], Type[Bar], Type[Baz]]
are completely equivalent.
If some_class
could be any of a number of classes, you may want to make them all inherit from the same base class, and use Type[BaseClass]
. Note that the inheritance must be non-virtual for now (mypy support for virtual inheritance is being discussed).
Edited to confirm that Type[Union[...
is allowed.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With