(apologies, I wasn't sure what the best title for this post would be, feel free to edit).
Lets say I have the following relational structure between words and their type (i.e. a dictionary):
dictionary <- data.frame(level1=c(rep("Positive", 3), rep("Negative", 3)), level2 = c("happy", "fantastic", "great", "sad", "rubbish", "awful"))
# level1 level2
# 1 Positive happy
# 2 Positive fantastic
# 3 Positive great
# 4 Negative sad
# 5 Negative rubbish
# 6 Negative awful
and we have counted their occurrences across seven documents (i.e. a term-document matrix):
set.seed(42)
range = 0:3
df <- data.frame(row.names = c("happy", "fantastic", "great", "sad", "rubbish", "awful"), doc1 = sample(x=range, size=6, replace=TRUE), doc2 = sample(x=range, size=6, replace=TRUE), doc3 = sample(x=range, size=6, replace=TRUE), doc4 = sample(x=range, size=6, replace=TRUE), doc5 = sample(x=range, size=6, replace=TRUE), doc6 = sample(x=range, size=6, replace=TRUE), doc7 = sample(x=range, size=6, replace=TRUE))
# doc1 doc2 doc3 doc4 doc5 doc6 doc7
# happy 3 2 3 1 0 2 0
# fantastic 3 0 1 2 2 3 0
# great 1 2 1 3 1 1 3
# sad 3 2 3 0 3 2 2
# rubbish 2 1 3 3 1 0 1
# awful 2 2 0 3 3 3 1
Then I can easily calculate how often two words appear in the same document (i.e. a co-occurrence or adjacency matrix):
# binary to indicate a co-occurrence
df[df > 0] <- 1
# sum co-occurrences
m <- as.matrix(df) %*% t(as.matrix(df))
# happy fantastic great sad rubbish awful
# happy 5 4 5 4 4 4
# fantastic 4 5 5 4 4 4
# great 5 5 7 6 6 6
# sad 4 4 6 6 5 5
# rubbish 4 4 6 5 6 5
# awful 4 4 6 5 5 6
Question: How can I restructure my co-occurrence matrix so that I am looking at the word type (level1) in the dictionary rather that just the words themselves (level2)?
i.e. I would like:
data.frame(row.names = c("Positive", "Negative"), Positive = c(5+4+5+4+5+5+5+5+7, 4+4+6+4+4+6+4+4+6), Negative = c(4+4+4+4+4+4+6+6+6, 6+5+5+5+6+5+5+5+6))
# Positive Negative
# Positive 45 42
# Negative 42 48
What I've done thus far: Previously I had hoped to be able to deduce the process from this question Sum together columns of data.frame based on name type
However whilst I can reduce the rows:
require(data.table)
dt <- data.table(m)
dt[, level1:=c(rep("Positive", 3), rep("Negative", 3))]
dt[, lapply(.SD, sum), by = "level1"]
# level1 happy fantastic great sad rubbish awful
# 1: Positive 14 14 17 14 14 14
# 2: Negative 12 12 18 16 16 16
I can't work out how to reduce the columns as require.
Continuing from df[df > 0] <- 1
library(reshape)
library(reshape2)
library(data.table)
# incorporating @RicardoSaporta's suggestion of using data.table(keep.rownames = TRUE)
dt <- data.table(as.matrix(df) %*% t(as.matrix(df)), keep.rownames = TRUE)
#reducing matrix format to plain data format, look at dt to see the change
dt <- melt(dt, "rn")
#getting positive/negative for word1 and word2
dt <- merge(dt,dictionary, all.x = TRUE, by.y = "level2", by.x = "rn")
dt <- merge(dt,dictionary, all.x = TRUE, by.y = "level2", by.x = "variable", suffixes = c("_1","_2"))
#getting counts for each positive/negative - positive/negative combination
dt <- data.table(dt)
dt[,list(value = sum(value)), by = c("level1_1","level1_2")]
#structuring
cast(dt,level1_1~level1_2, fun.aggregate=sum)
Output
> cast(dt,level1_1~level1_2, fun.aggregate=sum)
level1_1 Negative Positive
1 Negative 48 42
2 Positive 42 45
Basically same solution as the other two so far, just a bit more compact and probably a bit faster:
library(reshape2)
library(data.table)
mdt = data.table(melt(m), key = 'Var1')
dic = data.table(dictionary, key = 'level2')
dcast(dic[setkey(dic[mdt], Var2)], level1 ~ level1.1, fun.aggregate = sum)
# level1 Negative Positive
#1 Negative 48 42
#2 Positive 42 45
You could go back a step, doing the aggregation on the adjacency matrix before creating the co-occurence matrix:
dict <- data.table(dictionary,key='level2')
adj2 <- data.table(df,keep.rownames=TRUE)
adj1 <- adj2[,lapply(.SD,sum),by=dict[rn]$level1]
# one tedious step:
adj1mat <- as.matrix(adj1[,-1])
rownames(adj1mat) <- as.character(adj1$dict)
m1 <- adj1mat %*% t(adj1mat)
# Positive Negative
# Positive 45 42
# Negative 42 48
It will make sense to have your dictionary stored as a keyed data.table anyway, I expect.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With