I am reading a book on ASP.NET MVC and I'm wondering how the following example works:
public class MyController : Controller { public ActionResult Index() { ViewBag.MyProperty = 5; return View(); } }
<h1>@ViewBag.MyProperty</h1>
Now I understand that ViewBag
is a dynamic object, so that's how you can set the property (though I don't know much about dynamic objects, never worked with them.) But how does the view get the specific instance of the ViewBag
from the controller, even though we don't pass anything directly?
I thought that the ViewBag
could be a public
static
object, but then any change to it would be global and it wouldn't be specific to a view instance.
Could you elaborate as to how this works behind the scenes?
public class MyController : Controller { public ActionResult Index() { ViewBag.MyProperty = 5; return View(); } public ActionResult Index2() { ViewBag.MyProperty = 6; return View(); } }
Now let's say the Index
method is called first, and then the Index2
. In the end the value of ViewBag.MyProperty
will end up as 6 (the value from Index2
). I feel that it is not a good thing to do, but at the same time I feel that I'm thinking in desktop development terms. Maybe it doesn't matter when used with ASP.NET MVC, as the web is stateless. Is this the case?
The ViewBag in ASP.NET MVC is used to transfer temporary data (which is not included in the model) from the controller to the view. Internally, it is a dynamic type property of the ControllerBase class which is the base class of the Controller class.
The ViewBag feature allows us to define arbitrary properties on a dynamic object and access them in a view. The dynamic object is accessed through the Controller.
ViewBag
is a property of ControllerBase
, which all controllers must inherit from. It's a dynamic
object, that's why you can add new properties to it without getting compile time errors.
It's not static
, it's a member of the object. During the request lifetime, the controller instance is created and disposed, so you won't have "concurrency" problems, like overwriting the value.
The View
(and its variants) method is not static
as well, and this is how the view receives the ViewBag
values: during the process of rendering the view, the controller instance has its ViewBag instance as well.
If you would analyse ControllerBase class you would see that ViewBag property is a "proxy" to ViewData property just to make your source look nicer. (I even remember Scott Hanselman taking interview from Phil Haack where Phil introduced ViewBag property as a shortcut to ViewData and eliminating the need of repeated square brackets and quotes). Even though ViewBag
property is exposed as dynamic
object it implements a DynamicViewDataDictionary class which works directly with ViewData.
Looking at source code of Controller class you can find this method:
protected internal virtual ViewResult View(string viewName, string masterName, object model)
So basically when you call return View();
from your controller it creates a new instance of ActionResult
class passing ViewData from controller to it's constructor. Instance of ActionResult
is then passed to a particular view engine (ASPX, Razor) so it could be used to render a view in question.
Making ViewBag/ViewData public static could be harmful. Each web request to your MVC application creates a new instance of controller. If you'd have ViewData/ViewBag as public static then two concurrent users would share same data from ViewBag/ViewData.
Here is a video. Discussion on ViewBag (formder ViewModel) starts at 04:05
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With