I am thinking about switching from a self-implemented versioning-solution to Hibernate Envers, but I am not quite sure yet. I have read a lot about it, but I am concerned about schema changes and how Envers deals with them after having historized data according to an older schema.
What is your experience with Envers in this regard? How do you deal with schema changes and existing data with Envers?
Update 1:
It is not just about adding removing simple columns from a table, but e.g. when changing a simple Forein-Key-Relationship into a separate entity with two 1:n-relationships (M2M with attributed columns. This is a "logical" change in your data model. How do you deal with that when using Envers, when there is already historized data according to the old model? Is there an alternative to manually write sql-scripts and transfering them into the new representation?
Hibernate Envers provides a very simple solution for CDC (Change Data Capture). It uses the Hibernate Event system to intercept all entity state transitions and audit them. The database transaction will roll back and both the actual changes and the audit log is rolled back.
The Envers module is a core Hibernate model that works both with Hibernate and JPA. In fact, you can use Envers anywhere Hibernate works whether that is standalone, inside WildFly or JBoss AS, Spring, Grails, etc. The Envers module aims to provide an easy auditing / versioning solution for entity classes.
Additionaly, there is a "REVINFO" table generated, which contains only two fields: the revision id and revision timestamp. A row is inserted into this table on each new revision, that is, on each commit of a transaction, which changes audited data.
Note that if Hotel was audited RelationTargetAuditMode.NOT_AUDITED will just be ignored (you will have historical data for Hotel). @ NotAudited means "I just don't care for this field in historical data" (it won't be saved, relationship will be null, you won't see it when looking historical data about CustomerBooking )
In my experience, Envers simply copies every field from your entity table to its audit tables. The copied fields in the audit tables have no constraints on them, including nullability and foreign key constraints, so there's no problem with adding or removing such constraints on the real tables. Any kind of relationships you add to your entities will just be new audit columns and/or tables added under Envers, and it's up to you to correctly interpret them in their historical context.
For your example, if I understand correctly, of switching from a join-column-based relationship to a join-table-based one, you'd simply have the old join column coexisting with the join table, and at the point of the cutover, the former will cease being populated in favor of the latter. Your history will be completely preserved, including the fact that you made this switch. If you want all the old data to fit into the new model in the audit tables, it's up to you to do the migration.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With