I want to use the same thread pool throughout my application. To this end, I can make ExecutorService
static and global so that I can invoke ThreadUtil.executorService
to get ExecutorService
when I need it.
public class ThreadUtil {
public static final ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
}
Is it OK to instance multiple thread pools like this?
In addition, my application is a TCP server. If I don't know how big the pool should be, is it ok to simply use newCachedThreadPool
?
When an instance with the same properties is to be used anywhere in your program, it is logical to declare it static and final instead of re-creating the instance each time but I would personally opt for a Singleton pattern instead of directly giving public access to the instance.
As for your second query, I don't see any problem with it. The first sentence of the documentation for newCachedThreadPool
says
Creates a thread pool that creates new threads as needed
since you don't know how many threads will be created, this is the most logical choice.
Note that newCachedThreadPool
will re-use old threads when they are available to increase performance.
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With