What is Abstract Factory Pattern :-
It provides a way where a top level factory encapsulate a group of individual factories that are further able to create the family of related products without specifying their concrete classes.
As per Examples of GoF Design Patterns in Java's core libraries below is cited as example of Abstract pattern
javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory#newInstance()
But i am not sure how come its following the Abstract Factory Pattern here.
Is DocumentBuilderFactory considered as top level factory which internally
cotains individual factory i.e DocumentBuilderFactory#newInstance() which is able to create the family of related products without specifying their concrete classes (as it just return the DocumentBuilderFactory not any specific implementation). Is this correct?
Reference
What is a factory pattern?
A Factory method pattern (aka Factory pattern) is a creational pattern. The creational patterns abstract the object instantiation process by hiding how the objects are created and make the system independent of the object creation process.
An Abstract factory pattern is one level of abstraction higher than a factory method pattern which means it returns the factory classes.

Const
public interface Const {
public static final int SHAPE_CIRCLE =1;
public static final int SHAPE_SQUARE =2;
public static final int SHAPE_HEXAGON =3;
}
ShapeFactory
public abstract class ShapeFactory {
public abstract Shape getShape(int shapeId);
}
In addition to SimpleShapeFactory we create new one:
ComplexShapeFactory
public class ComplexShapeFactory extends ShapeFactory {
public Shape getShape(int shapeTypeId){
Shape shape = null;
if(shapeTypeId == Const.SHAPE_HEXAGON) {
shape = new Hexagon();//complex shape
}
else{
// drop an error
};
return shape;
}
}
Now let’s create at the abstract factory, which returns one of the types of ShapeFactory:
ShapeFactoryType
public class ShapeFactoryType {
public static final int TYPE_SIMPLE = 1;
public static final int TYPE_COMPLEX = 2;
public ShapeFactory getShapeFactory(int type) {
ShapeFactory sf = null;
if(type == TYPE_SIMPLE) {
sf = new SimpleShapeFactory();
}
else if (type == TYPE_COMPLEX) {
sf = new ComplexShapeFactory();
}
else throw new BadShapeFactoryException("No factory!!");
return sf;
}
}
And now the main call:
ShapeFactoryType abFac = new ShapeFactoryType();
ShapeFactory factory = null;
Shape s = null;
//returns a ShapeFactory but whether it is a
//SimpleShapeFactory or a ComplexShapeFactory is not known to the caller.
factory = abFac.getShapeFactory(1);//returns SimpleShapeFactory
//returns a Shape but whether it is a Circle or a Pentagon is
//not known to the caller.
s = factory.getShape(2); //returns square.
s.draw(); //draws a square
//returns a ShapeFactory but whether it is a
//SimpleShapeFactory or a ComplexShapeFactory is not
//known to the caller.
factory = abFac.getShapeFactory(2);
//returns a Shape but whether it is a Circle or a Pentagon is
//not known to the caller.
s = factory.getShape(3); //returns a pentagon.
s.draw(); //draws a pentagon
The DocumentBuilderFactory is like ShapeFactoryType in example.
The newInstance(String factoryClassName,ClassLoader classLoader) returns new instance of a DocumentBuilderFactory based on factoryClassName (in my case I used abFac.getShapeFactory(1); and abFac.getShapeFactory(2);).
DocumentBuilderFactory#newInstance() gives you a DocumentBuilder, which is a factory for Documents.
So DocumentBuilderFactory is a factory that produces factories, or in other words, an abstract factory. This is required because there are many implementations of DocumentBuilder depending on JDK version and installed libraries.
Does that clear it up?
If you love us? You can donate to us via Paypal or buy me a coffee so we can maintain and grow! Thank you!
Donate Us With